Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24662929›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2015

Neuropsychological mechanism underlying antidepressant effect: a systematic meta-analysis.

Y Ma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y Ma1] Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA [2] Psychological and brain sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

SOCIAL EFFECTS OF THREATS TO SELFR01MH059282 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2001 to 2020
$6.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01MH059282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antidepressants are widely used in clinical practice for the treatment of depression and other mood disorders. Numerous neuroimaging studies have recently examined how antidepressants influence emotional processes. However, both clinical trials and neuroimaging studies have reported inconsistent responses to antidepressants. Moreover, the neuropsychological mechanisms by which antidepressants act to improve depressive features remain underspecified. This systematic meta-analysis summarizes pharmacological neuroimaging studies (before February 2013) and the antidepressant effects on human brain activity underlying emotional processes. Sixty fMRI studies (involving 1569 subjects) applying antidepressants vs control were included in the current quantitative Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Pooling of results by ALE meta-analyses was stratified for population (mood disorder patients/healthy volunteers), emotional valence (positive/negative emotions) and treatment effects (increased/decreased brain activity). For both patients and healthy volunteers, the medial prefrontal and core limbic parts of the emotional network (for example, anterior cingulate, amygdala and thalamus) were increased in response to positive emotions but decreased to negative emotions by repeated antidepressant administration. Moreover, selective antidepressant effects were uncovered in patients and healthy volunteers, respectively. Antidepressants increased activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal (dlPFC), a key region mediating emotion regulation, during both negative and positive emotions in patients. Repeated antidepressant administration decreased brain responses to positive emotions in the nucleus accumbens, putamen, medial prefrontal and midbrain in healthy volunteers. Antidepressants act to normalize abnormal neural responses in depressed patients by increasing brain activity to positive stimuli and decreasing activity to negative stimuli in the emotional network, and increasing engagement of the regulatory mechanism in dlPFC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntidepressive AgentsCognition DisordersHumansMood DisordersNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24662929
OpenAlexW2063619953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.