Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24662849›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2014

Sequence variations at I260 and A1731 contribute to persistent currents in Drosophila sodium channels.

R Gao, Y Du, L Wang, Y Nomura, G Satar, D Gordon, M Gurevitz, A L Goldin, K Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R GaoDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
Y DuDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
L WangDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
Y NomuraDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
G SatarDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
D GordonDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology & Ecology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
M GurevitzDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology & Ecology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
A L GoldinDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
K DongDepartment of Entomology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States. Electronic address: dongk@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of action and resistance of sodium channel-targeting insectiR01GM057440 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DONG, KE, HUGHSON, FREDERICK M · 1999 to 2023
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM057440NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetrodotoxin-sensitive persistent sodium currents, INaP, that activate at subthreshold voltages, have been detected in numerous vertebrate and invertebrate neurons. These currents are believed to be critical for regulating neuronal excitability. However, the molecular mechanism underlying INaP is controversial. In this study, we identified an INaP with a broad range of voltage dependence, from -60mV to 20mV, in a Drosophila sodium channel variant expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Mutational analysis revealed that two variant-specific amino acid changes, I260T in the S4-S5 linker of domain I (ILS4-S5) and A1731V in the voltage sensor S4 of domain IV (IVS4), contribute to the INaP. I260T is critical for the portion of INaP at hyperpolarized potentials. The T260-mediated INaP is likely the result of window currents flowing in the voltage range where the activation and inactivation curves overlap. A1731V is responsible for impaired inactivation and contributes to the portion of INaP at depolarized potentials. Furthermore, A1731V causes enhanced activity of two site-3 toxins which induce persistent currents by inhibiting the outward movement of IVS4, suggesting that A1731V inhibits the outward movement of IVS4. These results provided molecular evidence for the involvement of distinct mechanisms in the generation of INaP: T260 contributes to INaP via enhancement of the window current, whereas V1731 impairs fast inactivation probably by inhibiting the outward movement of IVS4.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsElectric StimulationGenetic VariationGene Transfer TechniquesMembrane PotentialsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedNeurotoxinsPatch-Clamp TechniquesScorpion VenomsSodium ChannelsXenopusDrosophila ProteinsLqhalphaIT toxinNeurotoxinspara protein, DrosophilaScorpion VenomsSodium ChannelsDrosophila sodium channelpersistent currentwindow current

Identifiers

PMID24662849
PMCPMC4482340
OpenAlexW1971362973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.