Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24662718›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2014

The effects of reproductive hormones on the physical properties of cervicovaginal fluid.

Catherine A Chappell, Lisa C Rohan, Bernard J Moncla, Lin Wang, Leslie A Meyn, Katherine Bunge, Sharon L Hillier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Beyond the Barrier: Epithelial Cells as Immune Sentinels in the Female Genital Tract.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine A ChappellDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lisa C RohanMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Bernard J MonclaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lin WangMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Leslie A MeynMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Katherine BungeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sharon L HillierDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Magee-Womens Research Institute · USMagee-Womens Hospital · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Pharmaceutical and Regulatory CoreU19AI082639 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI FRIEND, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$13.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIAID NIH HHS AI 082639NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the impact of contraception, menopause, and vaginal flora on the physical and biochemical properties of cervicovaginal fluid (CVF). STUDY

designVaginal swabs, CVF, and cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) were collected from a total of 165 healthy asymptomatic women including: postmenopausal women (n = 29), women in the proliferative (n = 26) or follicular (n = 27) phase, and women using the levonogestrel intrauterine device (n = 28), depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 28) or combined oral contraceptives (n = 27). Vaginal smears were evaluated using the Nugent score. The osmolality, viscosity, density, and pH of CVL samples were measured.

resultsCVL from postmenopausal women and women with abnormal vaginal flora was less viscous and had higher pH than premenopausal women and women with normal flora, respectively. Women using hormonal contraceptives had more viscous CVL as compared with premenopausal women not using hormonal contraceptives, but this increase in viscosity was mitigated in the presence of bacterial vaginosis. Women using depomedroxyprogesterone acetate had less total protein in the CVL as compared with women using the levonogestrel intrauterine device, and had similar protein content when compared with postmenopausal women.

conclusionThe differences in CVL protein content between depomedroxyprogesterone acetate and levonogestrel intrauterine device suggest that type of progesterone and route of delivery impact the vaginal environment. Contraceptive hormone users had more viscous CVL than women not using contraceptives. However, the presence of bacterial vaginosis impacted both the pH and viscosity (regardless of hormonal contraceptive use), demonstrating that vaginal flora has a greater impact on the physical properties of CVF than reproductive hormones.

Indexed as

ContraceptionAdolescentAdultBody FluidsCervix UteriFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedProteinsVaginaVaginal SmearsVaginosis, BacterialViscosityLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProteinsbacterial vaginosiscervicovaginal fluidcontraceptives

Identifiers

PMID24662718
PMCPMC4149850
OpenAlexW1990527526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.