Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24662598›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2014

Complete protection against aflatoxin B(1)-induced liver cancer with a triterpenoid: DNA adduct dosimetry, molecular signature, and genotoxicity threshold.

Natalie M Johnson, Patricia A Egner, Victoria K Baxter, Michael B Sporn, Ryan S Wible, Thomas R Sutter, John D Groopman, Thomas W Kensler, Bill D Roebuck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intervention trial with calcium montmorillonite clay in a south Texas population exposed to aflatoxin.Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment · 2016
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Aflatoxin BOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024
    Review
  8. A Point Mutation at C151 ofMolecular pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Resolution of eicosanoid/cytokine storm prevents carcinogen and inflammation-initiated hepatocellular cancer progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Current Landscape of NRF2 Biomarkers in Clinical Trials.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Nrf2 in liver toxicology.Archives of pharmacal research · 2020
    Review
  17. Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Chronic and Acute Toxicities of Aflatoxins: Mechanisms of Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie M JohnsonAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health;
Patricia A EgnerAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health;
Victoria K BaxterDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
Michael B SpornDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire;
Ryan S WibleW. Harry Feinstone Center for Genomic Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee; and.
Thomas R SutterW. Harry Feinstone Center for Genomic Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee; and.
John D GroopmanAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health;
Thomas W KenslerAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bill D RoebuckDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Bill.D.Roebuck@dartmouth.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USDartmouth College · USUniversity of Memphis · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

PILOT STUDY--ACID FOG, AN EXPERIMENTAL MODELP30ES003819 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROOPMAN, JOHN D · 1985 to 2012
$22.6M
Molecular Mechanisms of Chemoprevention: NRF2 SignalingR01CA039416 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KENSLER, THOMAS W · 1985 to 2013
$7.0M
Training Veterinarians for Careers in Biomedical ResearchT32OD011089 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH L MANKOWSKI · 2012 to 2026
$6.7M
Role of Nrf2 Cross-Talk in Cancer ChemopreventionR01CA094076 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KENSLER, THOMAS W · 2002 to 2015
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039416NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094076NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 39416NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES003819NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES 03819NIH HHS T32 OD011089NIH HHS T32 OD 01189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In experimental animals and humans, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a potent hepatic toxin and carcinogen. The synthetic oleanane triterpenoid 1-[2-cyano-3-,12-dioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-oyl]imidazole (CDDO-Im), a powerful activator of Keap1-Nrf2 signaling, protects against AFB1-induced toxicity and preneoplastic lesion formation (GST-P-positive foci). This study assessed and mechanistically characterized the chemoprotective efficacy of CDDO-Im against AFB1-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A lifetime cancer bioassay was undertaken in F344 rats dosed with AFB1 (200 μg/kg rat/day) for four weeks and receiving either vehicle or CDDO-Im (three times weekly), one week before and throughout the exposure period. Weekly, 24-hour urine samples were collected for analysis of AFB1 metabolites. In a subset of rats, livers were analyzed for GST-P foci. The comparative response of a toxicogenomic RNA expression signature for AFB1 was examined. CDDO-Im completely protected (0/20) against AFB1-induced liver cancer compared with a 96% incidence (22/23) observed in the AFB1 group. With CDDO-Im treatment, integrated level of urinary AFB1-N(7)-guanine was significantly reduced (66%) and aflatoxin-N-acetylcysteine, a detoxication product, was consistently elevated (300%) after the first AFB1 dose. In AFB1-treated rats, the hepatic burden of GST-P-positive foci increased substantially (0%-13.8%) over the four weeks, but was largely absent with CDDO-Im intervention. The toxicogenomic RNA expression signature characteristic of AFB1 was absent in the AFB1 + CDDO-Im-treated rats. The remarkable efficacy of CDDO-Im as an anticarcinogen is established even in the face of a significant aflatoxin adduct burden. Consequently, the absence of cancer requires a concept of a threshold for DNA damage for cancer development.

Indexed as

Aflatoxin B1AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularDNA AdductsDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlutathione S-Transferase piImidazolesLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMaleOleanolic AcidOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPoisons1-(2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oyl) imidazoleAflatoxin B1aflatoxin B1-DNA adductBiomarkers, TumorDNA AdductsGlutathione S-Transferase piGstp1 protein, ratImidazolesOleanolic AcidPoisons

Identifiers

PMID24662598
PMCPMC4082474
OpenAlexW2107003939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.