Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24661923›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2014

Supersize me: how whole-genome sequencing and big data are transforming epidemiology.

Rowland R Kao, Daniel T Haydon, Samantha J Lycett, Pablo R Murcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phylodynamic analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Are rabid raccoons (Evolutionary applications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Review:Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  11. Unraveling the epidemiology ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Population genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rowland R KaoBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK. Electronic address: rowland.kao@glasgow.ac.uk.
Daniel T HaydonBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
Samantha J LycettBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
Pablo R MurciaMedical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Virus Research, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I013784/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In epidemiology, the identification of 'who infected whom' allows us to quantify key characteristics such as incubation periods, heterogeneity in transmission rates, duration of infectiousness, and the existence of high-risk groups. Although invaluable, the existence of many plausible infection pathways makes this difficult, and epidemiological contact tracing either uncertain, logistically prohibitive, or both. The recent advent of next-generation sequencing technology allows the identification of traceable differences in the pathogen genome that are transforming our ability to understand high-resolution disease transmission, sometimes even down to the host-to-host scale. We review recent examples of the use of pathogen whole-genome sequencing for the purpose of forensic tracing of transmission pathways, focusing on the particular problems where evolutionary dynamics must be supplemented by epidemiological information on the most likely timing of events as well as possible transmission pathways. We also discuss potential pitfalls in the over-interpretation of these data, and highlight the manner in which a confluence of this technology with sophisticated mathematical and statistical approaches has the potential to produce a paradigm shift in our understanding of infectious disease transmission and control.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsCommunicable DiseasesContact TracingForensic MedicineGenomicsGlobal HealthHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular EpidemiologyBayesian inferenceForensic epidemiologyMathematical modelingPathogen evolutionWho-infected-whom?

Identifiers

PMID24661923
PMCPMC7125769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.