Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24661461›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2014

Treatment preferences amongst physical therapists and chiropractors for the management of neck pain: results of an international survey.

Lisa C Carlesso, Joy C Macdermid, Anita R Gross, David M Walton, P Lina Santaguida

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02593721 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization Versus Ibuprofen Pharmacologic Treatment in Patients With Cervicobrachial Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled50ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsMedian Nerve Neural Mobilization, Ibuprofen
NCT02595294 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Neural Mobilization in Cervicobrachial Pain Compared to a Controlled Group

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled52ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsCervical Lateral Glide neural mobilization
NCT02596815 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effect of Median Nerve Neural Mobilization in Cervicobrachial Pain Compared to a Controlled Group

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2015 to 2015Enrolled51ConditionsCervicobrachial NeuralgiaArmsMedian Nerve Neural Mobilization, Goniometer
NCT06663592 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Slider and Tensioner Neurodynamic Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Neuromobılızatıon, Median Nerve, ElectromyographyArmsConventional treatment, Tensioner Neuro Dynamic Mobilization, Slider Neuro Dynamic Mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Massage for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa C CarlessoToronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street - MP11-328, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada. lccarlesso@gmail.com.
Joy C Macdermid
Anita R Gross
David M Walton
P Lina Santaguida
McMaster University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical practice guidelines on the management of neck pain make recommendations to help practitioners optimize patient care. By examining the practice patterns of practitioners, adherence to CPGs or lack thereof, is demonstrated. Understanding utilization of various treatments by practitioners and comparing these patterns to that of recommended guidelines is important to identify gaps for knowledge translation and improve treatment regimens.

aimTo describe the utilization of interventions in patients with neck pain by clinicians.

methodsA cross-sectional international survey was conducted from February 2012 to March 2013 to determine physical medicine, complementary and alternative medicine utilization amongst 360 clinicians treating patients with neck pain.

resultsThe survey was international (19 countries) with Canada having the largest response (38%). Results were analyzed by usage amongst physical therapists (38%) and chiropractors (31%) as they were the predominant respondents. Within these professions, respondents were male (41-66%) working in private practice (69-95%). Exercise and manual therapies were consistently (98-99%) used by both professions but tests of subgroup differences determined that physical therapists used exercise, orthoses and 'other' interventions more, while chiropractors used phototherapeutics more. However, phototherapeutics (65%), Orthoses/supportive devices (57%), mechanical traction (55%) and sonic therapies (54%) were not used by the majority of respondents. Thermal applications (73%) and acupuncture (46%) were the modalities used most commonly. Analysis of differences across the subtypes of neck pain indicated that respondents utilize treatments more often for chronic neck pain and whiplash conditions, followed by radiculopathy, acute neck pain and whiplash conditions, and facet joint dysfunction by diagnostic block. The higher rates of usage of some interventions were consistent with supporting evidence (e.g. manual therapy). However, there was moderate usage of a number of interventions that have limited support or conflicting evidence (e.g. ergonomics).

conclusionsThis survey indicates that exercise and manual therapy are core treatments provided by chiropractors and physical therapists. Future research should address gaps in evidence associated with variable practice patterns and knowledge translation to reduce usage of some interventions that have been shown to be ineffective.

Identifiers

PMID24661461
PMCPMC3987839
OpenAlexW2121202124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.