ArticleAmerican journal of stem cells2014
Rapid isolation of integrin rich multipotent stem cell pool and reconstruction of mouse epidermis equivalent.
Article in American journal of stem cells, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidermal stem cells: skin surveillance and clinical perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Progress in studies of epidermal stem cells and their application in skin tissue engineering.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Review
- Protein kinase D1 deficiency promotes differentiation in epidermal keratinocytes.Journal of dermatological science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe here epidermis reconstruction using multipotent mouse epidermal stem cells (EpSCs) enriched from keratinocyte isolates exploting exclusively the stem cell-adhesive property. This method excluded flowcytometry and was swift. Percent enrichment was measured by the uptake of Propidium iodide and Hoechst-33342 dye using flowcytometry to determine EpSCs yield. The sorted cells were characterized by analysis of stem cell markers using immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting techniques. Epidermis was reconstructed using the identified seeding density of EpSCs and the airlift tissue culture. Histology of natural vs reconstructed mammalian epidermis was also compared. Results showed a radical improvement of near 99% in the yield of integrin overexpressing EpSCs. The enriched EpSCs tested positive for biomarkers namely cytokeratin K-15 and, K-14, p63, beta-1-integrin, CD34 and could be passaged for longer durations. Adhesion sorted cells reconstructed the epidermis. The process of tissue reconstruction was faster using the adhesion sorted cells than the FACS sorted EpSCs. The product bioengineered using multipotent EpSCs was histologically similar to normal epidermis. Features like strata basalae, spinosum, granulosum, and corneum were alike real epidermis. The reconstructed epidermis displayed normal homeostasis, which can be considered an approximating actual product for investigative dermatology, toxicology, therapeutic research, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24660112PMC3960755W59613349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.