ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
What is the best strategy for successful bowel preparation under special conditions?
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrolyte disturbances after bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022Pooled it
- Two lives, one fight: navigating rectal cancer in pregnancy with multidisciplinary precision.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Taste aversion as an under-recognized determinant of bowel preparation quality.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- 1 versus 2 L PEG/Asc for bowel preparation in patients with hematochezia: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Impact of colonoscopy on health-related quality of life: findings from the RECEDE study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Article
- Colonoscopy Utilization in Elderly Patients with Dementia: Characteristics, Complications, and Charges in a National Matched-Cohort Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Same-day single-doseWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Low-Volume Bowel Preparation Is Associated With Reduced Time to Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol before elective colonoscopy in outpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018Article
- Bowel Preparation for a Better Colonoscopy Using Polyethylene Glycol or C-lax: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2017Article
- Polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in chronic kidney disease.Medicine · 2016Article
- Polyethylene glycols: An effective strategy for limiting liver ischemia reperfusion injury.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Education for Ward Nurses Influences the Quality of Inpatient's Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.Medicine · 2015Article
- Prerequisites of colonoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2014Review
- Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate bowel preparation is important for successful colonoscopic examination. Several effective colonic cleansing agents are available and routinely prescribed, but each carries its own limitations and benefits from particular dosing regimens. The most frequently prescribed colonic cleansing agent, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) cathartic solution, suffers from low patient compliance in general, due to its unpalatable taste and smell coupled with the large ingested volumes required. However, PEG is preferred over other cathartics for use in individuals of advanced age, sufferers of chronic kidney disease, heart failure and inflammatory bowel disease, and women who are pregnant or lactating. The laxative agents sodium phosphate (NaP) and sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate have been applied and have improved patient compliance and tolerance. NaP, however, should be avoided in individuals with impaired renal function or plasma clearance, such as those with chronic kidney disease, who are taking drugs that affect renal function, or who suffer from heart failure. Other special conditions that may affect an individual's tolerance of the cathartic agent or ability to complete the administration routine include stroke, severe constipation, hematochezia, suspicious lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and mental disorders such as dementia. All ingestible bowel preparation solutions can be instilled into the stomach and duodenum through nasogastric tube or esophagogastroduodenoscope with the aid of a water irrigation pump for patients with difficulties swallowing or ingesting the large volumes of fluid required. In addition, dietary regimens based on clear liquids and low-residue foods for 1-4 d prior to the colonoscopy may be supplemental bowel preparation strategies. Achieving an effective and safe cleansing of the bowel is important for successful colonoscopy in all patients, so full knowledge of the individual's condition and capabilities is necessary to select the most appropriate colonic cleansing agent and delivery regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.