Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24659864›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy.

Sanghoon Park, Yun Jeong Lim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06580366 (Sennosid A+B Versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation; A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06580366 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Sennosid A+B Versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation; A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHitit UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled600ConditionsBowel PreparationArmsSennosid A+B, Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Research progress on intestinal preparation before colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation?World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  10. Prerequisites of colonoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanghoon ParkSanghoon Park, Department of Internal Medicine, KEPCO Medical Center, KEPCO Medical Foundation, Seoul 132-703, South Korea.
Yun Jeong LimSanghoon Park, Department of Internal Medicine, KEPCO Medical Center, KEPCO Medical Foundation, Seoul 132-703, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-procedural cleansing of the bowel can maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of colonoscopy. Yet, efficacy of the current gold standard colonic preparation method - high-volume oral administration of purgative agents 12-24 h prior to the procedure - is limited by several factors, such as patient compliance (due to poor palatability and inconvenience of the dosing regimen) and risks of complications (due to drug interactions or intolerance). Attempts to resolve these limitations have included providing adjunctive agents and methods to promote the colonic cleansing ability of the principal purgative agent, with the aim of lessening unpleasant side effects (such as bloating) and reducing the large ingested volume requirement. Several promising adjunctive agents are bisacodyl, magnesium citrate, senna, simethicone, metoclopramide, and prokinetics, and each are being investigated for their potential. This review provides an up to date summary of the reported investigations into the potencies and weaknesses of the key adjuncts currently being applied in clinic as supplements to the traditional bowel preparation agents. While the comparative analysis of these adjuncts showed that no single agent or method has yet achieved the goal of completely overcoming the limitations of the current gold standard preparation method, they at least provide endoscopists with an array of alternatives to help improve the suboptimal efficacy of the main cleansing solutions when used alone. To aid in this clinical endeavor, a subjective grade was assigned to each adjunct to indicate its practical value. In addition, the systematic review of the currently available agents and methods provides insight into the features of each that may be overcome or exploited to create novel drugs and strategies that may become adopted as effective bowel cleansing adjuncts or alternatives.

Indexed as

CatharticsColonoscopyHumansCatharticsAdjunctsBowel preparationCatharticsColonoscopyPurgative agents

Identifiers

PMID24659864
PMCPMC3961967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.