Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24659774›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

SearchDOGS bacteria, software that provides automated identification of potentially missed genes in annotated bacterial genomes.

Seán S Óhéigeartaigh, David Armisén, Kevin P Byrne, Kenneth H Wolfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EcoSal Plus · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seán S ÓhéigeartaighSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
David Armisén
Kevin P Byrne
Kenneth H Wolfe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the development of SearchDOGS Bacteria, software to automatically detect missing genes in annotated bacterial genomes by combining BLAST searches with comparative genomics. Having successfully applied the approach to yeast genomes, we redeveloped SearchDOGS to function as a standalone, downloadable package, requiring only a set of GenBank annotation files as input. The software automatically generates a homology structure using reciprocal BLAST and a synteny-based method; this is followed by a scan of the entire genome of each species for unannotated genes. Results are provided in a HTML interface, providing coordinates, BLAST results, syntenic location, omega values (Ka/Ks, where Ks is the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site and Ka is the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site) for protein conservation estimates, and other information for each candidate gene. Using SearchDOGS Bacteria, we identified 155 gene candidates in the Shigella boydii sb227 genome, including 56 candidates of length < 60 codons. SearchDOGS Bacteria has two major advantages over currently available annotation software. First, it outperforms current methods in terms of sensitivity and is highly effective at identifying small or highly diverged genes. Second, as a freely downloadable package, it can be used with unpublished or confidential data.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, BacterialSoftwareBase SequenceGenomicsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidShigella boydiiSynteny

Identifiers

PMID24659774
PMCPMC4010983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.