Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24659500›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2014

In silico study of the structurally similar ORL1 receptor agonist and antagonist pairs reveal possible mechanism of receptor activation.

Milan Senćanski, Ljiljana Dosen-Mićović

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milan Senćanski
Ljiljana Dosen-Mićović
University of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An opioid receptor like (ORL1) receptor is a member of a family of G-protein coupled receptors. It is anew pharmaceutical target with broad therapeutic potential in the regulation of important biological functions such as nociception, mood disorders, drug abuse, learning or cardiovascular control. The crystal structure of this receptor in complex with an antagonist was determined recently (PDBID: 4EA3). By removing the ligand and subjecting the empty receptor to molecular dynamics simulation in a solvated lipid membrane we obtained an optimized ORL1 receptor structure which could be used in a subsequent docking study of two structurally similar agonist–antagonist ligand pairs. Ligands were docked to the empty ORL1 receptor (with and without the third intracellular loop, IC3)in different orientations, and the resulting complexes were monitored during molecular dynamics simulation in order to see how the subtle differences in structure of agonists and antagonists might affect ligand–receptor interactions and trigger receptor activation. It was established that agonists and antagonists bound to the same, relatively large, binding site in the receptor, created by residues from transmembrane helices TM2, TM3, TM5, TM6 and TM7 and close to the extra cellular end of the receptor bundle.The key difference between these two types of ligands is interaction with residue Val283(6.55) and a flexibility of ligand molecules. Ligands that cannot easily avoid this interaction will initiate movement of the intracellular end of TM6 (by a mechanism which involves Met134(3.36) and several amino acids of TM5) and possibly activate the receptor when assisted by G-protein.

Indexed as

Binding SitesComputer SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptin ReceptorReceptors, OpioidNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptin ReceptorReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID24659500
OpenAlexW2058208528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.