Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24659151›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2014

[Nailfold capillaroscopy].

M Geyer, M Vasile, W Hermann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Systemic sclerosis-clinical picture, diagnosis, and treatment].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [Capillary microscopy].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GeyerInnere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland, m.geyer@kerckhoff-klinik.de.
M Vasile
W Hermann
Kerckhoff Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillaroscopy is performed to evaluate the morphology, frequency and blood flow of nailfold capillaries as well as relevant extracapillary changes in rheumatic conditions. The main indication is the differentiation between primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. Various rheumatic conditions show different and partially typical pathognomonic alterations of the microcirculation or capillary patterns. This simple, noninvasive, inexpensive and effective technique is well suited for early diagnosis, especially of connective tissue diseases. The specific significance is highest for systemic sclerosis which is the most frequently evaluated entity. The corresponding microscopic alterations allow stage-adapted conclusions concerning the acuity of inflammation to be formed. That is not the only reason why capillaroscopy represents an important tool in follow-up controls and together with other techniques, such as flow measurement by laser Doppler, further conclusions can be drawn.

Indexed as

Blood Flow VelocityCapillariesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMicroscopic AngioscopyNailsRheumatic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24659151
OpenAlexW3190851411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.