Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658964›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of hematology2014

Older patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (≥65 years) profit more from higher imatinib doses than younger patients: a subanalysis of the randomized CML-Study IV.

Ulrike Proetel, Nadine Pletsch, Michael Lauseker, Martin C Müller, Benjamin Hanfstein, Stefan W Krause, Lida Kalmanti, Annette Schreiber, Dominik Heim, Gabriela M Baerlocher and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00055874 (Treatment Optimization Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00055874 phase3completednot on this map

Treatment Optimization Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) - Randomized Controlled Comparison of Imatinib vs. Imatinib/Interferon-alpha vs. Imatinib/Low-Dose AraC vs. Interferon-alpha Standard Therapy and Determination of the Role of Allografting in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeidelberg UniversityRan2002 to 2017Enrolled1,551ConditionsLeukemiaArmsrecombinant interferon alfa, cytarabine, hydroxyurea, imatinib mesylate, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ulrike Proetel
Nadine Pletsch
Michael Lauseker
Martin C Müller
Benjamin Hanfstein
Stefan W Krause
Lida Kalmanti
Annette Schreiber
Dominik Heim
Gabriela M Baerlocher
Wolf-Karsten Hofmann
Elisabeth Lange
Hermann Einsele
Martin Wernli
Stephan Kremers
Rudolf Schlag
Lothar Müller
Mathias Hänel
Hartmut Link
Bernd Hertenstein
Markus Pfirrman
Andreas Hochhaus
Joerg Hasford
Rüdiger Hehlmann
Susanne Saußele
German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Study Group
Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische Krebsforschung (SAKK)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of imatinib dose on response rates and survival in older patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase has not been studied well. We analyzed data from the German CML-Study IV, a randomized five-arm treatment optimization study in newly diagnosed BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Patients randomized to imatinib 400 mg/day (IM400) or imatinib 800 mg/day (IM800) and stratified according to age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) were compared regarding dose, response, adverse events, rates of progression, and survival. The full 800 mg dose was given after a 6-week run-in period with imatinib 400 mg/day. The dose could then be reduced according to tolerability. A total of 828 patients were randomized to IM400 or IM800. Seven hundred eighty-four patients were evaluable (IM400, 382; IM800, 402). One hundred ten patients (29 %) on IM400 and 83 (21 %) on IM800 were ≥65 years. The median dose per day was lower for patients ≥65 years on IM800, with the highest median dose in the first year (466 mg/day for patients ≥65 years vs. 630 mg/day for patients <65 years). Older patients on IM800 achieved major molecular remission and deep molecular remission as fast as younger patients, in contrast to standard dose imatinib with which older patients achieved remissions much later than younger patients. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both age groups. Five-year relative survival for older patients was comparable to that of younger patients. We suggest that the optimal dose for older patients is higher than 400 mg/day. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00055874

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBenzamidesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesBenzamidesImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID24658964
PMCPMC4050299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.