Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658916›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2014

Long-term response to imatinib is not affected by the initial dose in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: final update from the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) study.

Michele Baccarani, Brian J Druker, Susan Branford, Dong-Wook Kim, Fabrizio Pane, Lidia Mongay, Manisha Mone, Christine-Elke Ortmann, Hagop M Kantarjian, Jerald P Radich and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current status and novel strategy of CML.International journal of hematology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early Management of CML.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Single-Molecule Sequencing Reveals Patterns of Preexisting Drug Resistance That Suggest Treatment Strategies in Philadelphia-Positive Leukemias.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michele Baccarani
Brian J Druker
Susan Branford
Dong-Wook Kim
Fabrizio Pane
Lidia Mongay
Manisha Mone
Christine-Elke Ortmann
Hagop M Kantarjian
Jerald P Radich
Timothy P Hughes
Jorge E Cortes
François Guilhot

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The TOPS trial evaluated high- (800 mg/day; n = 319) versus standard-dose (400 mg/day; n = 157) imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 42 months or discontinued early. Major molecular response (MMR) rates were similar between arms at (51.6 vs 50.2 % for 400 and 800 mg/day, respectively; P = 0.77) and by (75.8 vs 79.0 %; P = 0.4807) 42 months. There were no differences in event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival(PFS), or overall survival (OS) between arms. The estimated rates of PFS on treatment and OS at 42 months were significantly higher in patients with MMR at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with those without MMR.Adverse events were more frequent with high-dose imatinib. Patients with B1 treatment interruption (vs [1) and those able to maintain imatinib C600 mg/day (vs\600 mg/day) in the first year of treatment had faster and higher response rates, but no improvement in EFS or PFS. Adherence to prescribed dose without interruption may be more important than initiation of therapy with higher doses of imatinib. Achievement of MMR correlated with longterm clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesFollow-Up StudiesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhasePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImatinib MesylatePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.