ReviewCurrent urology reports2014
Emerging endoscopic imaging technologies for bladder cancer detection.
Review in Current urology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional hydrogel biomaterials for urological diagnosis and treatment-design strategies and application progress: a review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Optical and Photoacoustic Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics in urology - molecular characterization of pathophysiology and response to treatment.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Fluorescence-Based Microendoscopic Sensing System for Minimally Invasive In Vivo Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Oligopeptide Transporter-1 is Associated with Fluorescence Intensity of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Photodynamic Diagnosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.Yonago acta medica · 2020Article
- Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy During Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Efficacy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Intravital microscopy in the study of the tumor microenvironment: from bench to human application.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- In vivo biodistribution and toxicity of intravesical administration of quantum dots for optical molecular imaging of bladder cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Albert Institute for Bladder Cancer Research Symposium.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Article
- A Novel Endoscope System for Position Detection and Depth Estimation of the Ureter.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Advances in imaging technologies in the evaluation of high-grade bladder cancer.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2015Review
- Nanotechnology in bladder cancer: current state of development and clinical practice.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2015Review
- Confocal laser endomicroscopy of bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a new era of optical diagnosis?Current urology reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern urologic endoscopy is the result of continuous innovations since the early nineteenth century. White-light cystoscopy is the primary strategy for identification, resection, and local staging of bladder cancer. While highly effective, white light cystoscopy has several well-recognized shortcomings. Recent advances in optical imaging technologies and device miniaturization hold the potential to improve bladder cancer diagnosis and resection. Photodynamic diagnosis and narrow band imaging are the first to enter the clinical arena. Confocal laser endomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography, Raman spectroscopy, UV autofluorescence, and others have shown promising clinical and pre-clinical feasibility. We review their mechanisms of action, highlight their respective advantages, and propose future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.