ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2014
The cost of breast cancer screening in the United States: a picture is worth ... a billion dollars?
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of recommendations on screening strategies for breast cancer due to hereditary predisposition: Who, When, and How?Cancer medicine · 2021Pooled it
- The Value of Outpatient Imaging-Based Cancer Screening Episodes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Analysis of utilization patterns and associated costs of the breast imaging and diagnostic procedures after screening mammography.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2018Article
- Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016Article
- Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.The Medical clinics of North America · 2015Review
- Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24658697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.