Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658693›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2014

U.S. physicians' perspective of adult vaccine delivery.

Laura P Hurley, Carolyn B Bridges, Rafael Harpaz, Mandy A Allison, Sean T O'Leary, Lori A Crane, Michaela Brtnikova, Shannon Stokley, Brenda L Beaty, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surveillance of Vaccination Coverage Among Adult Populations -United States, 2018.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura P Hurley
Carolyn B Bridges
Rafael Harpaz
Mandy A Allison
Sean T O'Leary
Lori A Crane
Michaela Brtnikova
Shannon Stokley
Brenda L Beaty
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Faruque Ahmed
Craig Hales
Allison Kempe
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USDenver Health Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · US

Funding

ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERU48DP001938 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER/HSC DENVER · PI MARSHALL, JULIE A · 2009 to 2013
$7.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5U48DP001938NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults are at substantial risk for vaccine-preventable disease, but their vaccination rates remain low.

objectiveTo assess practices for assessing vaccination status and stocking recommended vaccines, barriers to vaccination, characteristics associated with reporting financial barriers to delivering vaccines, and practices regarding vaccination by alternate vaccinators.

designMail and Internet-based survey.

settingSurvey conducted from March to June 2012.

participantsGeneral internists and family physicians throughout the United States. MEASUREMENTS: A financial barriers scale was created. Multivariable linear modeling for each specialty was performed to assess associations between a financial barrier score and physician and practice characteristics.

resultsResponse rates were 79% (352 of 443) for general internists and 62% (255 of 409) for family physicians. Twenty-nine percent of general internists and 32% of family physicians reported assessing vaccination status at every visit. A minority used immunization information systems (8% and 36%, respectively). Almost all respondents reported assessing need for and stocking seasonal influenza; pneumococcal; tetanus and diphtheria; and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccines. However, fewer assessed and stocked other recommended vaccines. The most commonly reported barriers were financial. Characteristics significantly associated with reporting greater financial barriers included private practice setting, fewer than 5 providers in the practice, and, for general internists only, having more patients with Medicare Part D. The most commonly reported reasons for referring patients elsewhere included lack of insurance coverage for the vaccine (55% for general internists and 62% for family physicians) or inadequate reimbursement (36% and 41%, respectively). Patients were most often referred to pharmacies/retail stores and public health departments. LIMITATIONS: Surveyed physicians may not be representative of all physicians.

conclusionImproving adult vaccination delivery will require increased use of evidence-based methods for vaccination delivery and concerted efforts to resolve financial barriers, especially for smaller practices and for general internists who see more patients with Medicare Part D. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

Internal MedicinePhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24658693
PMCPMC4594851
OpenAlexW2108633488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.