Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658605›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2014

Prognostic and predictive value of p-Akt, EGFR, and p-mTOR in early breast cancer.

Georgios Lazaridis, Sofia Lambaki, Georgia Karayannopoulou, Anastasia G Eleftheraki, Irene Papaspirou, Mattheos Bobos, Ioannis Efstratiou, George Pentheroudakis, Nikolaos Zamboglou, George Fountzilas

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Loss of PTEN Expression, PIK3CA Mutations, and Breast Cancer Survival in the Nurses' Health Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgios Lazaridis
Sofia Lambaki
Georgia Karayannopoulou
Anastasia G Eleftheraki
Irene Papaspirou
Mattheos Bobos
Ioannis Efstratiou
George Pentheroudakis
Nikolaos Zamboglou
George Fountzilas
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRAlexandra Hospital · GRHellenic Cooperative Oncology Group · GRPapageorgiou General Hospital · GRSana Klinikum Offenbach · DEUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere are scarce data available on the prognostic/predictive value of p-Akt and p-mTOR protein expression in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples from 997 patients participating in two adjuvant phase III trials were assessed for EGFR, PTEN, p-Akt, p-mTOR protein expression, and PIK3CA mutational status. These markers were evaluated for associations with each other and with selected patient and tumor characteristics, immunohistochemical subtypes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsp-mTOR protein expression was negatively associated with EGFR and positively associated with PTEN, with p-Akt473, and with the presence of PIK3CA mutations. EGFR expression was positively associated with p-Akt473, p-Akt308, and PIK3CA wild-type tumors. Finally, p-Akt308 was positively associated with p-Akt473 expression. In univariate analysis, EGFR (p = 0.016) and the coexpression of EGFR and p-mTOR (p = 0.015) were associated with poor OS. Among patients with p-Akt308-negative or low-expressing tumors, those treated with hormonal therapy were associated with decreased risk for both relapse and death (p = 0.013 and p < 0.001, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with locoregional relapse, positive EGFR and mTOR protein expression was found to be associated with increased (p = 0.034) and decreased (p < 0.001) risk for earlier relapse, respectively. In multivariate analysis, low levels of p-Akt308 and the coexpression of EGFR and p-mTOR retained their prognostic value.

conclusionLow protein expression of p-Akt308 was associated with improved DFS and OS among patients treated with hormonal therapy following adjuvant chemotherapy. Coexpression of EGFR and p-mTOR was associated with worse OS.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerErbB ReceptorsFemaleGreeceHumansIncidenceOncogene Protein v-aktPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMTOR protein, humanOncogene Protein v-aktTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24658605
OpenAlexW164886646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.