ArticlePloS one2014
Semi-automatic classification of birdsong elements using a linear support vector machine.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- TweetyBERT: Automated parsing of birdsong through self-supervised machine learning.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Anterior forebrain pathway in parrots is necessary for producing learned vocalizations with individual signatures.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Article
- Machine learning and statistical classification of birdsong link vocal acoustic features with phylogeny.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Reversible inhibition of the basal ganglia prolongs repetitive vocalization but only weakly affects sequencing at branch points in songbirds.Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Recent Advances at the Interface of Neuroscience and Artificial Neural Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Article
- Interactive extraction of diverse vocal units from a planar embedding without the need for prior sound segmentation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- The impacts of fine-tuning, phylogenetic distance, and sample size on big-data bioacoustics.PloS one · 2022Article
- Measuring context dependency in birdsong using artificial neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Comparing recurrent convolutional neural networks for large scale bird species classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Toward a Computational Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: From Bioacoustics to Neurophysiology, Emerging Tools and Future Directions.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
- Article
- Bird sound spectrogram decomposition through Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for the acoustic classification of bird species.PloS one · 2017Article
- Automatic Recognition of Element Classes and Boundaries in the Birdsong with Variable Sequences.PloS one · 2016Article
- Distributed acoustic cues for caller identity in macaque vocalization.Royal Society open science · 2015Article
- Variability in the temporal parameters in the song of the Bengalese finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015Article
- VoICE: A semi-automated pipeline for standardizing vocal analysis across models.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- A telesurveillance system with automatic electrocardiogram interpretation based on support vector machine and rule-based processing.JMIR medical informatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birdsong provides a unique model for understanding the behavioral and neural bases underlying complex sequential behaviors. However, birdsong analyses require laborious effort to make the data quantitatively analyzable. The previous attempts had succeeded to provide some reduction of human efforts involved in birdsong segment classification. The present study was aimed to further reduce human efforts while increasing classification performance. In the current proposal, a linear-kernel support vector machine was employed to minimize the amount of human-generated label samples for reliable element classification in birdsong, and to enable the classifier to handle highly-dimensional acoustic features while avoiding the over-fitting problem. Bengalese finch's songs in which distinct elements (i.e., syllables) were aligned in a complex sequential pattern were used as a representative test case in the neuroscientific research field. Three evaluations were performed to test (1) algorithm validity and accuracy with exploring appropriate classifier settings, (2) capability to provide accuracy with reducing amount of instruction dataset, and (3) capability in classifying large dataset with minimized manual labeling. The results from the evaluation (1) showed that the algorithm is 99.5% reliable in song syllables classification. This accuracy was indeed maintained in evaluation (2), even when the instruction data classified by human were reduced to one-minute excerpt (corresponding to 300-400 syllables) for classifying two-minute excerpt. The reliability remained comparable, 98.7% accuracy, when a large target dataset of whole day recordings (∼30,000 syllables) was used. Use of a linear-kernel support vector machine showed sufficient accuracies with minimized manually generated instruction data in bird song element classification. The methodology proposed would help reducing laborious processes in birdsong analysis without sacrificing reliability, and therefore can help accelerating behavior and studies using songbirds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.