Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Next generation MUT-MAP, a high-sensitivity high-throughput microfluidics chip-based mutation analysis panel.

Erica B Schleifman, Rachel Tam, Rajesh Patel, Alison Tsan, Teiko Sumiyoshi, Ling Fu, Rupal Desai, Nancy Schoenbrunner, Thomas W Myers, Keith Bauer and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erica B SchleifmanOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rachel TamOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rajesh PatelOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Alison TsanChemistry and Innovation Technology, Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Teiko SumiyoshiOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Ling FuOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rupal DesaiOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Nancy SchoenbrunnerChemistry and Innovation Technology, Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Thomas W MyersProgram in Core Research, Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Keith BauerProgram in Core Research, Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Edward SmithProgram in Core Research, Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Pleasanton, California, United States of America.
Rajiv RajaOncology Biomarker Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Materials Systems (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular profiling of tumor tissue to detect alterations, such as oncogenic mutations, plays a vital role in determining treatment options in oncology. Hence, there is an increasing need for a robust and high-throughput technology to detect oncogenic hotspot mutations. Although commercial assays are available to detect genetic alterations in single genes, only a limited amount of tissue is often available from patients, requiring multiplexing to allow for simultaneous detection of mutations in many genes using low DNA input. Even though next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms provide powerful tools for this purpose, they face challenges such as high cost, large DNA input requirement, complex data analysis, and long turnaround times, limiting their use in clinical settings. We report the development of the next generation mutation multi-analyte panel (MUT-MAP), a high-throughput microfluidic, panel for detecting 120 somatic mutations across eleven genes of therapeutic interest (AKT1, BRAF, EGFR, FGFR3, FLT3, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MET, NRAS, and PIK3CA) using allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) and Taqman technology. This mutation panel requires as little as 2 ng of high quality DNA from fresh frozen or 100 ng of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Mutation calls, including an automated data analysis process, have been implemented to run 88 samples per day. Validation of this platform using plasmids showed robust signal and low cross-reactivity in all of the newly added assays and mutation calls in cell line samples were found to be consistent with the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database allowing for direct comparison of our platform to Sanger sequencing. High correlation with NGS when compared to the SuraSeq500 panel run on the Ion Torrent platform in a FFPE dilution experiment showed assay sensitivity down to 0.45%. This multiplexed mutation panel is a valuable tool for high-throughput biomarker discovery in personalized medicine and cancer drug development.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesErbB Receptorsfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3GTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsMicrofluidicsNeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPolymerase Chain ReactionProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AKT1 protein, humanBRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsFGFR3 protein, humanFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3GTP PhosphohydrolasesHRAS protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsMET protein, humanNRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3

Identifiers

PMID24658394
PMCPMC3962342
OpenAlexW2033173589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.