Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24658103›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting.

Jyoti S Mathad, Ramesh Bhosale, Vikrant Sangar, Vidya Mave, Nikhil Gupte, Savita Kanade, Ashwini Nangude, Kavita Chopade, Nishi Suryavanshi, Prasad Deshpande and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03305991 (The Role of Maternal TB Infection for Adverse Pregnancy and Infant Health Outcomes in Ethiopia - a Long-term Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03305991 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Maternal TB Infection for Adverse Pregnancy and Infant Health Outcomes in Ethiopia - a Long-term Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorLund UniversityRan2015 to 2024Enrolled2,120ConditionsTuberculosis, Pregnancy Complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Discordance of 3rd and 4th generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold assays by pregnancy stages in India.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. DiminishedOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Transcriptional Analysis for Tuberculosis in Pregnant Women From the PRegnancy Associated Changes In Tuberculosis Immunology (PRACHITi) Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stages of pregnancy and HIV affect diagnosis of tuberculosis infection and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-induced immune response: Findings from PRACHITi, a cohort study in Pune, India.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jyoti S MathadDivision of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ramesh BhosaleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vikrant SangarByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vidya MaveByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Nikhil GupteByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Savita KanadeByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ashwini NangudeByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Kavita ChopadeByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Nishi SuryavanshiByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Prasad DeshpandeByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vandana KulkarniByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Marshall J GlesbyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Daniel FitzgeraldDivision of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Renu BharadwajDepartment of Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Pradeep SambareyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amita GuptaByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College- Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Government Medical College · INB. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INCornell University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

T32: Pathogenesis of Infectious Diseases Training ProgramT32AI007613 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ROY M. GULICK · 1999 to 2026
$8.8M
Byramee Jeejeebhoy Medical College (BJMC), Pune, India: Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069497 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, AMITA · 2007 to 2011
$4.1M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR000458 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Complications of Chronic Viral InfectionsK24AI078884 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GLESBY, MARSHALL J · 2008 to 2012
$892k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000458NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR00458NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI078884NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007613NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy.

resultsThe QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST-/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31-32% vs TST 11-17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset.

conclusionsTiming and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansIndiaInterferon-gamma Release TestsLatent TuberculosisMass ScreeningPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, Third

Identifiers

PMID24658103
PMCPMC3962385
OpenAlexW2160659748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.