Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24657968›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2014

Spine neck plasticity regulates compartmentalization of synapses.

Jan Tønnesen, Gergely Katona, Balázs Rózsa, U Valentin Nägerl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 447 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrahigh-Performance Mix-Structure GaSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An anatomical substrate of credit assignment in reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan Tønnesen1] Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience (IINS), University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. [2] UMR 5297, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Bordeaux, France.
Gergely KatonaTwo-photon Imaging Center, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs RózsaTwo-photon Imaging Center, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
U Valentin Nägerl1] Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience (IINS), University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. [2] UMR 5297, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Bordeaux, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUHUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · HUInstitut Interdisciplinaire de Neuroscience · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines have been proposed to transform synaptic signals through chemical and electrical compartmentalization. However, the quantitative contribution of spine morphology to synapse compartmentalization and its dynamic regulation are still poorly understood. We used time-lapse super-resolution stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging in combination with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements, two-photon glutamate uncaging, electrophysiology and simulations to investigate the dynamic link between nanoscale anatomy and compartmentalization in live spines of CA1 neurons in mouse brain slices. We report a diversity of spine morphologies that argues against common categorization schemes and establish a close link between compartmentalization and spine morphology, wherein spine neck width is the most critical morphological parameter. We demonstrate that spine necks are plastic structures that become wider and shorter after long-term potentiation. These morphological changes are predicted to lead to a substantial drop in spine head excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) while preserving overall biochemical compartmentalization.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBacterial ProteinsBiophysical PhenomenaCA1 Region, HippocampalDendritic SpinesElectric ImpedanceLong-Term PotentiationLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOrgan Culture TechniquesPatch-Clamp TechniquesBacterial ProteinsLuminescent Proteinsyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID24657968
OpenAlexW2033125075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.