Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24657911›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2014

miR-34: from bench to bedside.

Massimiliano Agostini, Richard A Knight

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. MicroRNAs, Stem Cells in Bipolar Disorder, and Lithium Therapeutic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Massimiliano AgostiniMedical Research Council, Toxicology Unit, Leicester University, Leicester, UK.
Richard A Knight

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U132670600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mir-34 family was originally cloned and characterized in 2007 as a p53 target gene. Almost immediately it became clear that its major role is as a master regulator of tumor suppression. Indeed, when overexpressed, it directly and indirectly represses several oncogenes, resulting in an increase of cancer cell death (including cancer stem cells), and in an inhibition of metastasis. Moreover, its expression is deregulated in several human cancers. In 2013, a miR-34 mimic has become the first microRNA to reach phase 1 clinical trials. Here we review the miR-34 family and their role in tumor biology, and discuss the potential therapeutic applications of miR-34a mimic.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53MicroRNAsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID24657911
PMCPMC4011589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.