Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24656563›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2014

Comparative population genomics: power and principles for the inference of functionality.

David S Lawrie, Dmitri A Petrov

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamics of dN/dS within recombining bacterial populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S LawrieDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: dlawrie@stanford.edu.
Dmitri A PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Population Genomics of Adaptive Transposition in DrosophilaR01GM089926 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2010 to 2013
$969k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of sequenced genomes from multiple related organisms allows the detection and localization of functional genomic elements based on the idea that such elements evolve more slowly than neutral sequences. Although such comparative genomics methods have proven useful in discovering functional elements and ascertaining levels of functional constraint in the genome as a whole, here we outline limitations intrinsic to this approach that cannot be overcome by sequencing more species. We argue that it is essential to supplement comparative genomics with ultra-deep sampling of populations from closely related species to enable substantially more powerful genomic scans for functional elements. The convergence of sequencing technology and population genetics theory has made such projects feasible and has exciting implications for functional genomics.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenomicsAnimalsBase SequenceHumansModels, GeneticMutationPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24656563
PMCPMC4073783
OpenAlexW2129833142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.