Trial reportContraception2014
Randomized clinical trial of self versus clinical administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Trial report in Contraception, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Getting Up to Date with What Works: A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness and Safety of Task Sharing of Modern Methods in Family Planning Services.BioMed research international · 2023Pooled it
- Self-administered subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate for improving contraceptive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2021Pooled it
- Update to U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: Self-Administration of Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2021Guideline
- Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2019Pooled it
- Self-administration of injectable contraceptives: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2017Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to Expanding User-Administered Injectable Contraceptives in the United States.O&G open · 2026Article
- Return to fertility after subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a narrative review.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2025Review
- Feasibility and acceptability of DMPA-SC self-injection in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Acceptability of and preferences for long-acting injectable hormonal contraception among US women: evidence from a national cross-sectional online survey.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Patient experiences switching from in-clinic to self-administration of injectable contraception in two Western US states.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations in patients with and without the use of antiseizure medications.Contraception · 2024Article
- Review
- Characteristics associated with use of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) in Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Uganda.Contraception: X · 2021Article
- Continuation of self-injected versus provider-administered contraception in Senegal: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study.Contraception · 2019Article
- Trends in subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) use in Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda.Contraception: X · 2019Article
- Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of self-injected DMPA-SC compared with health-worker-injected DMPA-IM in Senegal.Contraception: X · 2019Article
- Introduction of Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA-SC) Injectable Contraception at Facility and Community Levels: Pilot Results From 4 Districts of Uganda.Global health, science and practice · 2018Article
- Continuation of injectable contraception when self-injected vs. administered by a facility-based health worker: a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study in Uganda.Contraception · 2018Article
- Is a lower-dose, subcutaneous contraceptive injectable containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate likely to impact women's risk of HIV?Contraception · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate feasibility, acceptability, continuation, and trough serum levels following self-administration of subcutaneous (sc) depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). STUDY
designWomen presenting to a family planning clinic to initiate, restart or continue DMPA were offered study entry. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to self- or clinician administered sc DMPA 104 mg. Those randomized to self-administration were taught to self-inject and were supervised in performing the initial injection; they received printed instructions and a supply of contraceptive injections for home use. Participants randomized to clinician administration received usual care. Continued DMPA use was assessed by self-report and trough medroxyprogesterone acetate levels at 6 and 12 months.
resultsTwo hundred fifty women were invited to participate, and 137 (55%) enrolled. Of these, 91 were allocated to self-administration, and 90/91 were able to correctly self-administer sc DMPA. Eighty-seven percent completed follow-up. DMPA use at 1 year was 71% for the self-administration group and 63% for the clinic group (p=0.47). Uninterrupted DMPA use was 47% and 48% for the self and clinic administration groups at 1 year (p=0.70), respectively. Serum analyses confirmed similar mean DMPA levels in both groups and therapeutic trough levels in all participants.
conclusionsSixty-three percent of women approached were interested in trying self-administration of DMPA, even in the context of a randomized trial, and nearly all eligible for enrollment were successful at doing so. Self-administration and clinic administration resulted in similar continuation rates and similar DMPA serum levels. Self-administration of sc DMPA is feasible and may be an attractive alternative for many women. IMPLICATIONS: Self-administration of sc DMPA is a feasible and attractive option for many women. Benefits include increased control over contraceptive measures and less time spent on contracepting behaviors. Globally, self-administration has the potential to revolutionize contraceptive uptake by increasing the number of women with access to DMPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.