ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2014
Injection of composite with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and a novel synthetic hydrogel after myocardial infarction: a protective role in left ventricle function.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Injectable hydrogel-based combination therapy for myocardial infarction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of preclinical trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Application of Hydrogels in Cardiac Regeneration.Cardiology and therapy · 2023Review
- Latest Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Cardiac Tissues.Advanced materials technologies · 2022Article
- Electroconductive biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
- Analyzing Impetus of Regenerative Cellular Therapeutics in Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Can the outcomes of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for myocardial infarction be improved? Providing weapons and armour to cells.Cell proliferation · 2017Review
- Are Sertoli cells a kind of mesenchymal stem cells?American journal of translational research · 2017Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells in cardiac regeneration: a detailed progress report of the last 6 years (2010-2015).Stem cell research & therapy · 2016Review
- Heart Regeneration with Embryonic Cardiac Progenitor Cells and Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Journal of stem cell and transplantation biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of studies have shown that the transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) into the thinned infarct wall improves regional wall motion. In this study, we hypothesized that the injection of biomaterials and MSCs into the infarcted myocardium can preserve left ventricular (LV) function. To test this hypothesis, anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was induced in 34 rabbits and BMSCs with hydrogel composite were prepared. One week after inducing AMI, 28 of the 34 rabbits were divided into four groups (Groups A-D; three rabbits were used for bone marrow aspiration, and three rabbits died) and all received an epicardial injection. Group A received BMSCs with hydrogel composite marked by 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU); Group B received BMSCs only marked by BrdU; Group C received hydrogel only marked by BrdU; and Group D was the control group, which received fetal bovine serum. Echocardiography was performed before AMI was induced, 1 week after AMI, and 4 weeks after the epicardial injection. The results were compared with those before AMI, and the rabbits of all the four groups had significantly larger LV end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), thinner anterior wall (AW), lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF), lower VS and VE (p<0.05) 1 week after AMI, which were more significant in Group A (p<0.05). Compared with 1 week after AMI, Group A and Group B had significantly smaller LVDd, thicker AW, larger LVEF, larger VS and VE (p<0.05) 4 weeks after the epicardial injection, which were more significant in Group A (p<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in Group C and Group D. These results suggested that BMSCs with hydrogel composite could serve as an injectable biomaterial that prevents LV remodeling and dilation, and improves local systolic and diastolic function after AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.