Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24656147›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics.

Ivan P Gorlov, Ji-Yeon Yang, Jinyoung Byun, Christopher Logothetis, Olga Y Gorlova, Kim-Anh Do, Christopher Amos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational Tools for Parsimony Phylogenetic Analysis of Omics Data.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Spectral gene set enrichment (SGSE).BMC bioinformatics · 2015
    Article
  9. An Independent Filter for Gene Set Testing Based on Spectral Enrichment.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan P GorlovDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Unit 1374, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030-3721, USA. ivan.p.gorlov@dartmouth.edu.
Ji-Yeon Yang
Jinyoung Byun
Christopher Logothetis
Olga Y Gorlova
Kim-Anh Do
Christopher Amos
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Relation Between In-utero Vitamin D and Immune Function in Early Childhood P20GM104416 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2013 to 2022
$23.7M
Targeting Tumor Microenvironment-Induced Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisP50CA140388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOGOTHETIS, CHRISTOPHER J., THOMPSON, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2009 to 2022
$23.4M
Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30CA016672NCI NIH HHS 5 P50CA140388NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data-derived predictor of known cancer associated genes.

resultsWe found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes--identifying differentially expressed genes--is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011-2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples.

conclusionsThe observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes.

Indexed as

GenomicsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansLogistic ModelsNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24656147
PMCPMC3997969
OpenAlexW1965214246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.