ArticleBMC genomics2014
How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving data interpretability with new differential sample variance gene set tests.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A TMEFF2-regulated cell cycle derived gene signature is prognostic of recurrence risk in prostate cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- A multi-omics approach for identifying important pathways and genes in human cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Integration of copy number and transcriptomics provides risk stratification in prostate cancer: A discovery and validation cohort study.EBioMedicine · 2015Article
- Computational Tools for Parsimony Phylogenetic Analysis of Omics Data.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2015Article
- Causal Modeling of Cancer-Stromal Communication Identifies PAPPA as a Novel Stroma-Secreted Factor Activating NFκB Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Spectral gene set enrichment (SGSE).BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- An Independent Filter for Gene Set Testing Based on Spectral Enrichment.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data-derived predictor of known cancer associated genes.
resultsWe found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes--identifying differentially expressed genes--is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011-2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples.
conclusionsThe observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.