Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24655875›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2014

Extracorporeal life support in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: how long should we treat?

David W Kays, Saleem Islam, Douglas S Richards, Shawn D Larson, Joy M Perkins, James L Talbert

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pediatric Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Illness.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  5. Neonatal respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and primary diagnosis: trends between two decades.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Congenital Diaphragmatic hernia - a review.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David W KaysDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: david.kays@surgery.ufl.edu.
Saleem IslamDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Douglas S RichardsIntermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Shawn D LarsonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Joy M PerkinsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
James L TalbertDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a frequently lethal birth defect and, despite advances, extracorporeal life support (ie, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) is commonly required for severely affected patients. Published data suggest that CDH survival after 2 weeks on ECMO is poor. Many centers limit duration of ECMO support. STUDY

designWe conducted a single-institution retrospective review of 19 years of CDH patients treated with ECMO, designed to evaluate which factors affect survival and duration of ECMO and define how long patients should be supported.

resultsOf two hundred and forty consecutive CDH patients without lethal associated anomalies, 96 were treated with ECMO and 72 (75%) survived. Eighty required a single run of ECMO and 65 survived (81%), 16 required a second ECMO run and 7 survived (44%). Of patients still on ECMO at 2 weeks, 56% survived, at 3 weeks 46% survived, and at 4 weeks, 43% of patients still on ECMO survived to discharge. After 5 weeks of ECMO, survival had dropped to 15%, and after 40 days of ECMO support there were no survivors. Apgar score at 1 minute, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group predicted survival all correlated with survival on ECMO, need for second ECMO, and duration of ECMO. Lung-to-head ratio also correlated with duration of ECMO. All survivors were discharged breathing spontaneously with no support other than nasal cannula oxygen if needed.

conclusionsIn patients with severe CDH, improvement in pulmonary function sufficient to wean from ECMO can take 4 weeks or longer, and might require a second ECMO run. Pulmonary outcomes in these CDH patients can still be excellent, and the assignment of arbitrary ECMO treatment durations <4 weeks should be avoided.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalCombined Modality TherapyDecision Support TechniquesHernia, DiaphragmaticHerniorrhaphyHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24655875
PMCPMC4048811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.