Trial reportAmerican heart journal2014
Influence of the metaboreflex on arterial blood pressure in heart failure patients.
Trial report in American heart journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of the Metaboreflex on Pulmonary Vascular Capacitance in Heart Failure.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2016Trial
- Intrathecal fentanyl blockade of afferent neural feedback from skeletal muscle during exercise in heart failure patients: Influence on circulatory power and pulmonary vascular capacitance.International journal of cardiology · 2015Trial
- Blunted cardiovascular responses to exercise by inhibiting afferent feedback via spinal cord stimulation in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Consequences of group III/IV afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work on exercise tolerance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Experimental physiology · 2023Review
- A New Strategy for Identification of Coal Miners With Abnormal Physical Signs Based on EN-mRMR.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Unraveling the Role of Respiratory Muscle Metaboloreceptors under Inspiratory Training in Patients with Heart Failure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Locomotor muscle group III/IV afferents constrain stroke volume and contribute to exercise intolerance in human heart failure.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure: Central Role for the Pulmonary System.Exercise and sport sciences reviews · 2020Review
- Exaggerated exercise pressor reflex in type 2 diabetes: Potential role of oxidative stress.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2019Review
- Improved Ventilatory Efficiency with Locomotor Muscle Afferent Inhibition is Strongly Associated with Leg Composition in Heart Failure.International journal of cardiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFeedback from active locomotor muscles contributes to the exercise pressor response in healthy humans, and is thought to be more prominent in heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of metaboreflex stimulation on arterial pressure in HF.
methodsEleven HF patients (51 ± 5 years, New York Heart Association Class I/II, left ventricular ejection fraction 32 ± 3%) and 11 controls (42 ± 3 years) were recruited. Participants completed two exercise sessions on separate days: (1) symptom limited graded exercise test; and (2) constant work rate cycling (60% peak oxygen consumption,V˙O2) for 4 minutes with 2 minutes passive recovery. Recovery was randomized to normal or locomotor muscle regional circulatory occlusion (RCO). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure, heart rate (HR) and V˙O2 were measured at rest, end-exercise and recovery. O2 pulse (V˙O2/HR) and the rate pressure product (RPP = HR × SBP) were calculated.
resultsIn response to RCO, mean arterial pressure and SBP increased in HF compared with CTLs (6.8 ± 5.8% vs -3.0 ± 7.8%, P < .01 and 3.4 ± 6.4% vs -12.7 ± 10.4%, P < .01, respectively), with no difference in diastolic pressure (P = .61). HF patients had a smaller reduction in HR and RPP, but also displayed a larger decrease in O2 pulse consequent to locomotor metaboreflex stimulation (P < .05, for all).
conclusionRCO resulted in a markedly increased pressor response in HF relative to controls, due primarily to an increase of SBP and attenuated cardiac recovery as noted by the persistent elevation in HR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.