Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24655569›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Can virtual nature improve patient experiences and memories of dental treatment? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Karin Tanja-Dijkstra, Sabine Pahl, Mathew P White, Jackie Andrade, Jon May, Robert J Stone, Malcolm Bruce, Ian Mills, Melissa Auvray, Rhys Gabe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585905 (The Effect of Virtual Reality on the Behavior of Pediatric Dental Patients During Dental Sealant Application.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05585905 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality on the Behavior of Pediatric Dental Patients During Dental Sealant Application.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsBehavior, Child, Anxiety, DentalArmsVirtual Reality, Basic Behavior Guidance Techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karin Tanja-Dijkstra
Sabine Pahl
Mathew P WhiteEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, UK. mathew.white@exeter.ac.uk.
Jackie Andrade
Jon May
Robert J Stone
Malcolm Bruce
Ian Mills
Melissa Auvray
Rhys Gabe
David R Moles

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental anxiety and anxiety-related avoidance of dental care create significant problems for patients and the dental profession. Distraction interventions are used in daily medical practice to help patients cope with unpleasant procedures. There is evidence that exposure to natural scenery is beneficial for patients and that the use of virtual reality (VR) distraction is more effective than other distraction interventions, such as watching television. The main aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the use of VR during dental treatment can improve the overall dental experience and recollections of treatment for patients, breaking the negative cycle of memories of anxiety leading to further anxiety, and avoidance of future dental appointments. Additionally, the aim is to test whether VR benefits dental patients with all levels of dental anxiety or whether it could be especially beneficial for patients suffering from higher levels of dental anxiety. The third aim is to test whether the content of the VR distraction can make a difference for its effectiveness by comparing two types of virtual environments, a natural environment and an urban environment. METHODS/

designThe effectiveness of VR distraction will be examined in patients 18 years or older who are scheduled to undergo dental treatment for fillings and/or extractions, with a maximum length of 30 minutes. Patients will be randomly allocated into one of three groups. The first group will be exposed to a VR of a natural environment. The second group will be exposed to a VR of an urban environment. A third group consists of patients who receive standard care (control group). Primary outcomes relate to patients' memories of the dental treatment one week after treatment: (a) remembered pain, (b) intrusive thoughts and (c) vividness of memories. Other measures of interest are the dental experience, the treatment experience and the VR experience.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN41442806.

Indexed as

MemoryResearch DesignAdaptation, PsychologicalClinical ProtocolsDental AnxietyDental Restoration, PermanentDental Restoration, TemporaryEnglandHumansPatient SatisfactionPhotic StimulationSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTooth ExtractionTreatment OutcomeVirtual Reality Exposure Therapy

Identifiers

PMID24655569
PMCPMC3978097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.