Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24655515›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Effect of the attachment of the tectorial membrane on cochlear micromechanics and two-tone suppression.

Julien Meaud, Karl Grosh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advective mass transport along the cochlear coil.AIP conference proceedings · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Deiters Cells Act as Mechanical Equalizers for Outer Hair Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unified cochlear model for low- and high-frequency mammalian hearing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Drug Diffusion Along an Intact Mammalian Cochlea.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Modeling signal propagation in the human cochlea.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julien MeaudDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: julien.meaud@me.gatech.edu.
Karl GroshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Supplement: Active and Nonlinear Models for Cochlear MechanicsR01DC004084 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karl Grosh · 1999 to 2026
$6.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004084PHS HHS R01-04084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical stimulation of the outer hair cell hair bundle (HB) is a key step in nonlinear cochlear amplification. We show how two-tone suppression (TTS), a hallmark of cochlear nonlinearity, can be used as an indirect measure of HB stimulation. Using two different nonlinear computational models of the cochlea, we investigate the effect of altering the mechanical load applied by the tectorial membrane (TM) on the outer hair cell HB. In the first model (TM-A model), the TM is attached to the spiral limbus (as in wild-type animals); in the second model (TM-D model), the TM is detached from the spiral limbus (mimicking the cochlea of Otoa(EGFP/EGFP) mutant mice). As in recent experiments, model simulations demonstrate that the absence of the TM attachment does not preclude cochlear amplification. However, detaching the TM alters the mechanical load applied by the TM on the HB at low frequencies and therefore affects TTS by low-frequency suppressors. For low-frequency suppressors, the suppression threshold obtained with the TM-A model corresponds to a constant suppressor displacement on the basilar membrane (as in experiments with wild-type animals), whereas it corresponds to a constant suppressor velocity with the TM-D model. The predictions with the TM-D model could be tested by measuring TTS on the basilar membrane of the Otoa(EGFP/EGFP) mice to improve our understanding of the fundamental workings of the cochlea.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAuditory ThresholdHearingHumansMechanical PhenomenaOrgan of CortiTectorial Membrane

Identifiers

PMID24655515
PMCPMC3984990
OpenAlexW2018844101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.