Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24654857›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2014

Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions.

J David Jentsch, James R Ashenhurst, M Catalina Cervantes, Stephanie M Groman, Alexander S James, Zachary T Pennington

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Relationships between generalized impulsivity and subjective stimulant and sedative responses following alcohol administration.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Trial
  7. Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J David JentschDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
James R Ashenhurst
M Catalina Cervantes
Stephanie M Groman
Alexander S James
Zachary T Pennington

Funding

UCLA Training Program in Translational Neuroscience of Drug Abuse (TNDA)T32DA024635 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LARA A. RAY, Kate M Wassum · 2008 to 2026
$6.2M
Genetic Influences on Inhibitory Control and Cocaine SensitivityR01DA031852 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENTSCH, J. DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Synapsin 3: Involvement in Impulsivity and Drug Self-AdministrationR21DA038377 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JENTSCH, J. DAVID · 2014 to 2015
$404k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031852NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038377NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA024635NIDA NIH HHS T32-DA024635PHS HHS DAR01031852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addictions are often characterized as forms of impulsive behavior. That said, it is often noted that impulsivity is a multidimensional construct, spanning several psychological domains. This review describes the relationship between varieties of impulsivity and addiction-related behaviors, the nature of the causal relationship between the two, and the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that promote impulsive behaviors. We conclude that the available data strongly support the notion that impulsivity is both a risk factor for, and a consequence of, drug and alcohol consumption. While the evidence indicating that subtypes of impulsive behavior are uniquely informative--either biologically or with respect to their relationships to addictions--is convincing, multiple lines of study link distinct subtypes of impulsivity to low dopamine D2 receptor function and perturbed serotonergic transmission, revealing shared mechanisms between the subtypes. Therefore, a common biological framework involving monoaminergic transmitters in key frontostriatal circuits may link multiple forms of impulsivity to drug self-administration and addiction-related behaviors. Further dissection of these relationships is needed before the next phase of genetic and genomic discovery will be able to reveal the biological sources of the vulnerability for addiction indexed by impulsivity.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveDisease SusceptibilityImpulsive BehaviorTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsBrainDown-RegulationHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsReceptors, Dopamine D2Risk FactorsSerotonergic NeuronsSubstance-Related DisordersSynaptic TransmissionDRD2 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, Dopamine D2decision makinginhibitionvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID24654857
PMCPMC4360991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.