Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24654732›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2014

Empirical maps for the calculation of amide I vibrational spectra of proteins from classical molecular dynamics simulations.

Edyta Małolepsza, John E Straub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vibrational exciton nanoimaging of phases and domains in porphyrin nanocrystals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Solvent-Independent Anharmonicity for Carbonyl Oscillators.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edyta MałolepszaDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University , 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States.
John E Straub
Boston University · US

Funding

Probing the Principles Governing Protein AggregationR01GM076688 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI STRAUB, JOHN E. · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076688NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM076688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New sets of parameters (maps) for calculating amide I vibrational spectra for proteins through a vibrational exciton model are proposed. The maps are calculated as a function of electric field and van der Waals forces on the atoms of peptide bonds, taking into account the full interaction between peptide bonds and the surrounding environment. The maps are designed to be employed using data obtained from standard all-atom molecular simulations without any additional constraints on the system. Six proteins representing a wide range of sizes and secondary structure complexity were chosen as a test set. Spectra calculated for these proteins reproduce experimental data both qualitatively and quantitatively. The proposed maps lead to spectra that capture the weak second peak observed in proteins containing β-sheets, allowing for clear distinction between α-helical and β-sheet proteins. While the parametrization is specific to the CHARMM force field, the methodology presented can be readily applied to any empirical force field.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAmidesProteinsSpectrum AnalysisAmidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID24654732
PMCPMC4317051
OpenAlexW2316162497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.