Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24653583›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular disease research2013

Rural-urban differences in acute myocardial infarction mortality: Evidence from Nebraska.

Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan, Yang Wang, Samuel Opoku, Ge Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular disease research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Examining Predictors of Myocardial Infarction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Emergency Department Telemedicine Consults are Associated with Faster Time-to-Electrocardiogram and Time-to-Fibrinolysis for Myocardial Infarction Patients.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soumitra Sudip BhuyanDept. of Health Services Research & Administration, UNMC College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4350, USA.
Yang WangDept. of Health Services Research & Administration, UNMC College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4350, USA.
Samuel OpokuDept. of Health Services Research & Administration, UNMC College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4350, USA.
Ge LinDept. of Health Services Research & Administration, UNMC College of Public Health, 984350 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4350, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of death and disability in the United States and worldwide. Despite the importance of surveillance and secondary prevention, the incidence of and mortality from AMI are not continuously monitored, and little is known about survival outcomes after 30 days of AMI hospitalization or associated risk factors, especially in the rural areas. The current study examines rural-urban differences in both in- and out-hospital survival outcomes for AMI patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis using hospital discharge data in Nebraska for January 2005 to December 2009 and Nebraska death certificate records through October 2011. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the rural-urban difference in 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to predict out-of-hospital and overall survival rate.

resultsIn the 30-day mortality model, after controlling for age, comorbidities, and rehabilitation, patients in urban areas were less likely to die than patients in rural areas (odds ratio: 0.709, 95% confidence interval: 0.626-0.802). In the overall survival model, patients in urban areas had a lower hazard of AMI death (hazard ratio: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.806-0.931) than patients in rural areas. Patients with a previous history of heart failure had a significantly higher likelihood of 30-day mortality, while atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were associated with lower overall survival. Patients who attended at least 1 cardiac rehabilitation session had significantly lower 30-day and overall mortality (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThis study confirms previous findings on rural-urban disparities in 30-day mortality following AMI hospitalization, and reports new findings on overall rural-urban mortality disparity. The study also found an association between cardiac rehabilitation and reduced mortality, a finding never before reported at the population level. Further efforts are needed to develop systems in rural hospitals and communities to ensure that AMI patients receive recommended care.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionAcute myocardial infarction survival differenceRural health

Identifiers

PMID24653583
PMCPMC3953688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.