Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24652685›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2014

Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled cannabis smoking in frequent and occasional smokers.

Matthew N Newmeyer, Nathalie A Desrosiers, Dayong Lee, Damodara R Mendu, Allan J Barnes, David A Gorelick, Marilyn A Huestis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In reply.Clinical chemistry · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew N NewmeyerChemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, IRP, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Program in Toxicology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nathalie A Desrosiers
Dayong Lee
Damodara R Mendu
Allan J Barnes
David A Gorelick
Marilyn A Huestis
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Smoked Drugs Of AbuseZIADA000413 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHEIDWEILER, KARL · 2009 to 2016
$6.0M
Detection Of Drugs Of Abuse In Alternative Biological Fluids And TissuesZIADA000412 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHEIDWEILER, KARL · 2009 to 2016
$3.9M
Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Drugs Of AbuseZIADA000414 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHEIDWEILER, KARL · 2009 to 2016
$2.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000412Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral fluid (OF) is an increasingly popular alternative matrix for drug testing, with cannabinoids being the most commonly identified illicit drug. Quantification of multiple OF cannabinoids and understanding differences in OF cannabinoid pharmacokinetics between frequent and occasional smokers improve test interpretation. The new Oral-Eze® OF collection device has an elution buffer that stabilizes analytes and improves drug recovery from the collection pad; however, its performance has not been independently evaluated. After controlled smoking of a 6.8% Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) cannabis cigarette by frequent and occasional smokers, OF was collected with the Oral-Eze device for up to 30 h. Samples were analyzed for multiple cannabinoids by a validated 2D-GC-MS method. Frequent smokers had significantly greater OF THCCOOH concentrations than occasional smokers at all times, and showed positive results for a significantly longer time. We evaluated multiple cannabinoid cut-offs; the shortest last detection times were observed when THC ≥ 1 μg/L was combined with CBD or CBN ≥ 1 μg/L. With these cut-offs, last detection times(1-13.5 h) were not significantly different between groups, demonstrating suitability for short-term cannabinoid detection independent of smoking history. Cut-offs utilizing THC alone or combined with THCCOOH showed significantly different last detection times between groups. The widest detection windows were observed with THC ≥ 1 or 2 μg/L or THCCOOH ≥ 20 ng/L. Our data illustrate the effectiveness of the Oral-Eze® device for OF collection, the impact of self-administered smoked cannabis history on OF cannabinoid results, and the ability to improve interpretation and tailor OF cannabinoid cut-offs to fulfill the detection window needs of a given program.

Indexed as

AdultCannabinoidsDronabinolFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingSalivaSubstance Abuse DetectionTime FactorsYoung AdultCannabinoidsDronabinolcannabinoidsOral-Eze®oral fluid

Identifiers

PMID24652685
PMCPMC4169757
OpenAlexW1843888496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.