Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2015
[Computer-assisted treatment pathway for schizophrenia. Development and initial experiences].
Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the effects of implementing clinical pathways supported by health information technologies.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- [Treatment pathways in the care of patients with schizophrenia and depression].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standardization in psychiatry is a developmental process which, following on from psychopathology and nosology is now increasingly affecting the field of treatment. The development of guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric diseases has now become well accepted, although the impact on routine practice is still limited. Treatment pathways bring recommendations from guidelines into a clear and practice-oriented algorithm. The prerequisite for this is the inclusion of all aspects and elements of the treatment as well as all professions involved in the treatment and a valid electronic data processing foundation. Such an approach is presented here with the example of the development and implementation of a clinical pathway for inpatients with schizophrenia. Initial results revealed that patients who received multi-professional treatment within such a clinical pathway, improved better than patients of the control group, as measured by CGI, PANSS and PSP. This shows that introduction of a clinical pathway leads to an improvement of treatment quality. Standardization of psychiatric treatment processes could be highly relevant in respect to the new remuneration system for psychiatry in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24652598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.