Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24652598›Full record

Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2015

[Computer-assisted treatment pathway for schizophrenia. Development and initial experiences].

G Juckel, K Stahl, C Norra

Abstract readEnglish AbstractRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G JuckelKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland, georg.juckel@wkp-lwl.org.
K Stahl
C Norra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardization in psychiatry is a developmental process which, following on from psychopathology and nosology is now increasingly affecting the field of treatment. The development of guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric diseases has now become well accepted, although the impact on routine practice is still limited. Treatment pathways bring recommendations from guidelines into a clear and practice-oriented algorithm. The prerequisite for this is the inclusion of all aspects and elements of the treatment as well as all professions involved in the treatment and a valid electronic data processing foundation. Such an approach is presented here with the example of the development and implementation of a clinical pathway for inpatients with schizophrenia. Initial results revealed that patients who received multi-professional treatment within such a clinical pathway, improved better than patients of the control group, as measured by CGI, PANSS and PSP. This shows that introduction of a clinical pathway leads to an improvement of treatment quality. Standardization of psychiatric treatment processes could be highly relevant in respect to the new remuneration system for psychiatry in Germany.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdultCritical PathwaysDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologySoftware DesignTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.