Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24652476›Full record

ArticleCurrent osteoporosis reports2014

Ultrasound to assess bone quality.

Kay Raum, Quentin Grimal, Peter Varga, Reinhard Barkmann, Claus C Glüer, Pascal Laugier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis in a Chinese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. QUS characteristics in Normal Population: a Mini Review and our experience.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022
    Article
  11. Identifying Bone Matrix Impairments in a Mouse Model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) by Clinically Translatable Techniques.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Signal Processing Techniques Applied to Axial Transmission Ultrasound.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Analysis of Bone Strength and Bone Turnover Markers in Ankylosing Spondylitis with Radiological Hip Involvement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Vibrational spectroscopic techniques to assess bone quality.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kay RaumJulius Wolff Institute & Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany, kay.raum@charite.de.
Quentin Grimal
Peter Varga
Reinhard Barkmann
Claus C Glüer
Pascal Laugier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone quality is determined by a variety of compositional, micro- and ultrastructural properties of the mineralized tissue matrix. In contrast to X-ray-based methods, the interaction of acoustic waves with bone tissue carries information about elastic and structural properties of the tissue. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods represent powerful alternatives to ionizing x-ray based assessment of fracture risk. New in vivo applicable methods permit measurements of fracture-relevant properties, [eg, cortical thickness and stiffness at fragile anatomic regions (eg, the distal radius and the proximal femur)]. Experimentally, resonance ultrasound spectroscopy and acoustic microscopy can be used to assess the mesoscale stiffness tensor and elastic maps of the tissue matrix at microscale resolution, respectively. QUS methods, thus, currently represent the most promising approach for noninvasive assessment of components of fragility beyond bone mass and bone microstructure providing prospects for improved assessment of fracture risk.

Indexed as

Bone DensityFractures, BoneBone and BonesElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemurHumansOsteoporosisPorosityRadiusRisk AssessmentSpectrum Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.