ArticleMolecular biology reports2014
MRE11A and SKP2 genes are associated with the increased cytotoxicity induced by the synergistic effects of cisplatin and gemcitabine in bladder cancer cells.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRE11 Deficiency Occurs in a Small Group of Cancers from Various Different Tumor Entities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TRIM24 is critical for the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks through regulating the recruitment of MRN complex.Oncogene · 2023Article
- MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment.Molecular cancer · 2019Review
- Article
- Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Treatment Induces Concomitant SERTAD1, CDKN2B and GADD45A Modulation and Cellular Changes in Bladder Cancer Cells Regardless of the Site of TP53 Mutation.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2018Article
- SKP2 E3 ligase in urological malignancies: a critical regulator of the cell cycle and therapeutic target.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been shown previously to elicit a synergistic therapeutic effect on bladder cancer cell lines and result in reduced cell survival. However, the precise mechanism by which cells die has not been elucidated. Cell cycle-related genes are the predominant targets of chemotherapeutic protocols. Therefore, molecular biomarkers that are predictive of therapeutic outcomes associated with tumor sensitivity might be important for optimal treatment protocol selection. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in gene expression in cell cycle-related genes that were induced by cisplatin, gemcitabine or a combined treatment using both agents in a low-grade urinary bladder transitional carcinoma cell line (RT4). The following three treatment protocols were used: 1.0 μM cisplatin, 1.56 μM gemcitabine and a combination of 1.0 μM cisplatin and 1.56 μM gemcitabine. Cytometry and morphology analysis (by phase-contrast photomicrography) were performed in addition to pathway-specific gene expression analysis using quantitative RT-PCR gene arrays. The following results were observed after 1.0 μM cisplatin treatment: (1) a decrease in cell number, (2) an increased percentage of scattered cells and (3) downregulated expression of genes related to cell cycle arrest, G1/S-to-mitotic cell cycle transition, DNA repair, apoptosis, transcription and mitosis. Treatment with 1.56 μM gemcitabine, or with both drugs simultaneously, induced the following effects: (1) a decrease in cell number, (2) an increased percentage of scattered and elongated cells, (3) the modulation of genes that are predominantly involved in DNA repair and (4) a significant upregulation of genes related to cell cycle arrest. Reduced cell density was observed after the combined treatment compared to the two other single-agent protocols. The downregulation of MRE11A and SKP2 was observed only in cells subjected to the combined treatment. In conclusion, cisplatin, gemcitabine and the combination of both drugs elicited distinct toxicogenomic effects in the RT4 bladder transitional carcinoma cell line, although disruptions in the expression of cell cycle control-related genes and other pathways responsible for cell survival were observed for all of the protocols. MRE11A and SKP2 downregulation appeared to be responsible for the synergistic therapeutic effects elicited by cisplatin and gemcitabine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.