Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24652048›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Antiemetic efficacy and safety of a combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in patients with testicular germ cell tumor receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Shota Hamada, Shiro Hinotsu, Koji Kawai, Shigeyuki Yamada, Shintaro Narita, Tomomi Kamba, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Yoichi Arai, Tomonori Habuchi, Osamu Ogawa and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phase II study of palonosetron, aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by multiple-day emetogenic chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Trial
  3. Global inequitable distribution of seminal studies of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Palonosetron on Days 1 and 5In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shota HamadaDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Shiro Hinotsu
Koji Kawai
Shigeyuki Yamada
Shintaro Narita
Tomomi Kamba
Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Yoichi Arai
Tomonori Habuchi
Osamu Ogawa
Koji Kawakami
Kyoto University · JPAkita University · JPTohoku University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPOkayama University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to determine the antiemetic efficacy and safety of a combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone in patients with testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

methodsAn open-label, single-arm, multicenter study was performed in patients with TGCT who were scheduled to receive 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. The antiemetic therapy consisted of palonosetron 0.75 mg on day 1, aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2 to 5, and dexamethasone 9.9 mg on day 1 and 6.6 mg on days 2 to 8. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate, which was defined as no vomiting and no rescue medication, in the overall period (0 to 216 h) in the first chemotherapy course. Incidence and severity of nausea were assessed based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and a subjective rating scale completed by patients.

resultsThirty patients were included in the analysis. CR was achieved in 90.0% of the patients in the first chemotherapy course, and high CR rates were also observed in the second and third courses (82.1 and 78.3%, respectively). The incidence of nausea peaked on days 4 to 6 in about 50% of the patients. The reported adverse drug reactions were hiccups (13.3%), anorexia (3.3%), and stomach pain (3.3%). None of these were unexpected and none were grade 3 or 4.

conclusionsThe combination antiemetic therapy examined in this study was highly effective and well-tolerated in patients with TGCT receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAprepitantCisplatinDexamethasoneFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesMaleMorpholinesNauseaNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalPalonosetronQuinuclidinesTesticular NeoplasmsAntiemeticsAprepitantCisplatinDexamethasoneIsoquinolinesMorpholinesPalonosetronQuinuclidines

Identifiers

PMID24652048
OpenAlexW2155846704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.