ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2014
NOD2 gene mutations in ulcerative colitis: useless or misunderstood?
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct colitis-associated macrophages drive NOD2-dependent bacterial sensing and gut homeostasis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Proton pump inhibitors and gut microbiota dysbiosis: insights into the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Fundamental and emerging insights into innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Crohn's Disease Susceptibility and Onset Are Strongly Related to ThreeJournal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- Beneficial Effects of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Ulcerative Colitis in Mice.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016Article
- NOD2/CARD15 gene mutations in North Algerian patients with inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNOD2 mutations have been linked to an increased risk of Crohn's disease and to some of its phenotypes. The association between NOD2 mutations and susceptibility to ulcerative colitis (UC) remains somewhat controversial and potential correlations between these mutations and UC phenotype have not been studied.
aimTo assess whether NOD2 mutations are a risk factor for UC in Portugal and if there are any genotype-phenotype correlations in these patients.
methodsThe three main NOD2 mutations were searched in 200 patients with UC and in 202 healthy controls.
resultsNOD2 mutations were present in 28 patients with UC (14.0 %) and in 27 controls (13.4 %) (p = 0.853). Mutation carriers were more likely to receive steroids during the first year of disease than non-carriers (54.2 % vs. 29.6 %, p = 0.018) and among these patients the need for intravenous administration was more frequent in those with the R702W polymorphism (90.0 % vs. 45.5 %, p = 0.014). In patients with severe colitis admitted for intravenous steroids, a greater proportion of mutation carriers was considered intravenous-steroid refractory and required salvage therapy (90.0 % vs. 38.1 %, p = 0.004). Patients with NOD2 mutation were submitted to colectomy more frequently than non-carriers (17.9 % vs. 4.1 %. p = 0.015). No correlation with the need for immunosuppressants/immunomodulators was found.
conclusionsIn the Portuguese population, NOD2 mutations do not increase the risk of UC but are associated with a more aggressive course including greater need of steroids in the first year, increased incidence of intravenous-steroid refractoriness and a higher colectomy rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.