ArticlePloS one2014
Antagonistic action of Bacillus subtilis strain SG6 on Fusarium graminearum.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 240 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering the volatilome of Bacillus siamensis NKIT9: identification of potent antifungal volatile organic compounds against Rhizoctonia solani.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Reveal the Antagonistic Mechanism ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Co-occurrence networks reveal candidate AMF-microbe assemblages for generalist and crop-specific inocula.Mycorrhiza · 2026Article
- Microbial biodiversity in Tunisian olive grove soils: a reservoir of phytopathogenic fungi and potential beneficial microorganisms.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
- 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing and Functional Profiling of Rhizosphere Bacteria in Date Palms Reveal Diverse Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Traits.International journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic and functional characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Biological control of fusarium head blight in wheat using secondary metabolites of Bacillus subtilis BS-Z15.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Antagonistic Bacterial Endophytes from Gingers and their Metabolite Mediated Interactions Against Pythium Soft Rot.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Characterization of Two Potential BiocontrolMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Antagonistic mechanism ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Screening, isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from upland Rice for antagonism againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Features and rhizosphere colonization strategies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Bacterial seed endophytes promote barley growth and inhibits Fusarium graminearum in vitro.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Antifungal effect and some properties of cell-free supernatants of two Bacillus subtilis isolates against Fusarium verticillioides.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Seed Priming with RhizosphericToxins · 2024Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Are Infants and Children at Risk of Adverse Health Effects from Dietary Deoxynivalenol Exposure? An Integrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Mitigation of Mycotoxins in Food-Is It Possible?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antifungal potential of lipopeptides produced by theMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fusarium graminearum causes Fusarium head blight (FHB), a devastating disease that leads to extensive yield and quality loss of wheat and barley. Bacteria isolated from wheat kernels and plant anthers were screened for antagonistic activity against F. graminearum. Based on its in vitro effectiveness, strain SG6 was selected for characterization and identified as Bacillus subtilis. B. subtilis SG6 exhibited a high antifungal effect on the mycelium growth, sporulation and DON production of F. graminearum with the inhibition rate of 87.9%, 95.6% and 100%, respectively. In order to gain insight into biological control effect in situ, we applied B. subtilis SG6 at anthesis through the soft dough stage of kernel development in field test. It was revealed that B. subtilis SG6 significantly reduced disease incidence (DI), FHB index and DON (P ≤ 0.05). Further, ultrastructural examination shows that B. subtilis SG6 strain induced stripping of F. graminearum hyphal surface by destroying the cellular structure. When hypha cell wall was damaged, the organelles and cytoplasm inside cell would exude, leading to cell death. The antifungal activity of SG6 could be associated with the coproduction of chitinase, fengycins and surfactins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.