Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24651469›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Probabilistic approach to predicting substrate specificity of methyltransferases.

Teresa Szczepińska, Jan Kutner, Michał Kopczyński, Krzysztof Pawłowski, Andrzej Dziembowski, Andrzej Kudlicki, Krzysztof Ginalski, Maga Rowicka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The protein methylation network in yeast: A landmark in completeness for a eukaryotic post-translational modification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Arginine Methylation Regulates Ribosome CAR Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Teresa SzczepińskaNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jan KutnerLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał KopczyńskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof PawłowskiNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej DziembowskiInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej KudlickiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Sealy Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Krzysztof GinalskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Maga RowickaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America; Sealy Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000071 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2012 to 2014
$14.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000071NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000071NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000037CNHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-00245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a general probabilistic framework for predicting the substrate specificity of enzymes. We designed this approach to be easily applicable to different organisms and enzymes. Therefore, our predictive models do not rely on species-specific properties and use mostly sequence-derived data. Maximum Likelihood optimization is used to fine-tune model parameters and the Akaike Information Criterion is employed to overcome the issue of correlated variables. As a proof-of-principle, we apply our approach to predicting general substrate specificity of yeast methyltransferases (MTases). As input, we use several physico-chemical and biological properties of MTases: structural fold, isoelectric point, expression pattern and cellular localization. Our method accurately predicts whether a yeast MTase methylates a protein, RNA or another molecule. Among our experimentally tested predictions, 89% were confirmed, including the surprising prediction that YOR021C is the first known MTase with a SPOUT fold that methylates a substrate other than RNA (protein). Our approach not only allows for highly accurate prediction of functional specificity of MTases, but also provides insight into general rules governing MTase substrate specificity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremBinding SitesComputational BiologyFungal ProteinsIsoelectric PointLikelihood FunctionsMethyltransferasesModels, TheoreticalProbabilityProtein BindingProtein FoldingRNASaccharomyces cerevisiaeSubstrate SpecificityFungal ProteinsMethyltransferasesRNA

Identifiers

PMID24651469
PMCPMC3961171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.