ArticleCurrent biology : CB2014
Evolution: dynamics of de novo gene emergence.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene age and genome organization inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Functional associations of evolutionarily recent human genes exhibit sensitivity to the 3D genome landscape and disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- De Novo Genes.Annual review of genetics · 2024Review
- Novel technologies uncover novel 'anti'-microbial peptides inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Macroevolutionary dynamics of gene family gain and loss along multicellular eukaryotic lineages.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Strong evidence for the adaptive walk model of gene evolution in Drosophila and Arabidopsis.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- The Effects of Sequence Length and Composition of Random Sequence Peptides on the Growth ofGenes · 2021Article
- Evolution of a New Testis-Specific Functional Promoter Within the Highly ConservedFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Dedicated transcriptomics combined with power analysis lead to functional understanding of genes with weak phenotypic changes in knockout lines.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Speciation and the developmental alarm clock.eLife · 2020Review
- Combination of Proteogenomics with PeptidemBio · 2019Article
- In-depth analysis of Bacillus subtilis proteome identifies new ORFs and traces the evolutionary history of modified proteins.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Dealing with the adaptive immune system during de novo evolution of genes from intergenic sequences.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- The Xylella fastidosa RTX operons: evidence for the evolution of protein mosaics through novel genetic exchanges.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Encoding activities of non-coding RNAs.Theranostics · 2018Review
- Plant organ evolution revealed by phylotranscriptomics in Arabidopsis thaliana.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Rapid diversification of homothorax expression patterns after gene duplication in spiders.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- New Genes and Functional Innovation in Mammals.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Analysis of Copy Number Variation in the Abp Gene Regions of Two House Mouse Subspecies Suggests Divergence during the Gene Family Expansions.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- No Evidence for Phylostratigraphic Bias Impacting Inferences on Patterns of Gene Emergence and Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative genomics have brought much insight into the de novo emergence of genes. Two new studies in Drosophila explore the dynamics of gene gain and loss at the population and species levels, extending our view on the life cycle of genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24650912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.