Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2014
e-Care for heart wellness: a feasibility trial to decrease blood pressure and cardiovascular risk.
Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01077388 (Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk (e-Compare)
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Personalized Nutrition Interventions Improve Dietary Intake and Risk Factors in Adults With Elevated Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of digital health interventions for telemedicine/telehealth for managing blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Different Online Intervention Modalities for Middle-Aged Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic Health Record-Driven Approaches in Primary Care to Strengthen Hypertension Management Among Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Groups in the United States: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Team-Based Care for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Simulation Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Pooled it
- Consumer Devices for Patient-Generated Health Data Using Blood Pressure Monitors for Managing Hypertension: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Pooled it
- An Updated Meta-Analysis of Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring in Urban-Dwelling Patients with Hypertension.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.American journal of hypertension · 2020Pooled it
- Reporting of Telehealth-Delivered Dietary Intervention Trials in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies.Journal of human hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Web-Based Interventions Targeting Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Middle-Aged and Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Review
- Multilevel Interventions Demonstrate Mixed Effectiveness for Improving Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Rapid Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring dietitians' views on digital nutrition educational tools in Malaysia: a qualitative study.Nutrition research and practice · 2024Article
- Adherence to Telemonitoring Therapy for Medicaid Patients With Hypertension: Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPharmacist- or nurse-led team care decreases patient blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a Web-based dietitian-led (WD) team care intervention was feasible and resulted in decreased BP, CVD risk, and weight compared to usual care (UC).
methodsElectronic health record (EHR) data identified patients aged 30-69 years with BMI >26, elevated BP, and 10%-25% 10-year Framingham CVD risk who were registered patient website users. Patients with uncontrolled BP at screening were randomized to UC or WD, which included a home BP monitor, scale, and dietitian team care. WD participants had a single in-person dietitian visit to obtain baseline information and create a plan to reduce CVD risk. Planned follow-up occurred via secure messaging to report BP, weight, and fruit and vegetable intake and receive ongoing feedback. If needed, dietitians encouraged patients and their physicians to intensify antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications. Primary outcomes were change in systolic BP and weight loss ≥4 kg at 6 months. Feasibility outcomes included intervention utilization and satisfaction.
resultsBetween 2010 and 2011, a total of 90 of 101 participants completed 6-month follow-ups. The WD group had higher rates of secure messaging utilization and patient satisfaction. The WD group lost significantly more weight than the UC group (adjusted net difference=-3.2 kg, 95% CI=-5.0, -1.5, p<0.001) and was more likely to lose ≥4 kg (adjusted relative risk [RRadj]=2.96, 95% CI=1.16, 7.53). BP control and CVD risk reduction were greater in WD than UC, but differences were not statistically significant.
conclusionsWD intervention was feasible and resulted in decreased weight, BP, and CVD risk. A larger trial is justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial Registration Number: NCT01077388.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.