Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24650797›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Bayesian analysis of culture and PCR methods for detection of Campylobacter spp. in broiler caecal samples.

M E Arnold, E M Jones, J R Lawes, A B Vidal, F A Clifton-Hadley, J D Rodgers, L F Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M E ArnoldAnimal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough,UK.
E M JonesBiomathematics and Statistics Group, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.
J R LawesEpidemiology and Risk Group, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.
A B VidalDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.
F A Clifton-HadleyDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.
J D RodgersDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.
L F PowellEpidemiology and Risk Group, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a culture method and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for detection of two Campylobacter species: C. jejuni and C. coli. Data were collected during a 3-year survey of UK broiler flocks, and consisted of parallel sampling of caeca from 436 batches of birds by both PCR and culture. Batches were stratified by season (summer/non-summer) and whether they were the first depopulation of the flock, resulting in four sub-populations. A Bayesian approach in the absence of a gold standard was adopted, and the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR and culture for each Campylobacter subtype was estimated, along with the true C. jejuni and C. coli prevalence in each sub-population. Results indicated that the sensitivity of the culture method was higher than that of PCR in detecting both species when the samples were derived from populations infected with at most one species of Campylobacter. However, from a mixed population, the sensitivity of culture for detecting both C. jejuni or C. coli is reduced while PCR is potentially able to detect both species, although the total probability of correctly identifying at least one species by PCR is similar to that of the culture method.

Indexed as

CampylobacterAnimalsBayes TheoremCampylobacter InfectionsChickensDNA, BacterialFecesPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24650797
PMCPMC9206810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.