ArticleBMC cancer2014
Nucleostemin expression in invasive breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- GNL3 SUMOylation is essential for DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Loss of Drosophila nucleostemin 1 disrupts ribosomal protein homeostasis and rRNA processing to trigger apoptosis via the Xrp1/Irbp18 complex.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Impact TMPRSS2-ERG Molecular Subtype on Prostate Cancer Recurrence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Piezo1 Overexpression on Peritumoral Brain Edema in Glioblastomas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Silencing of Nucleostemin by siRNA Induces Apoptosis in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 Cell Lines.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2020Article
- Prognostic value of stem cell markers in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: a meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Nucleostemin reveals a dichotomous nature of genome maintenance in mammary tumor progression.Oncogene · 2019Article
- Observational
- The oncogenic role of GNL3 in the progression and metastasis of osteosarcoma.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Gene expression profiling of NB4 cells following knockdown of nucleostemin using DNA microarrays.Molecular medicine reports · 2016Article
- FAK activity protects nucleostemin in facilitating breast cancer spheroid and tumor growth.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2015Article
- Guanine nucleotide binding protein-like 3 is a potential prognosis indicator of gastric cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
- Eribulin mesylate targets human telomerase reverse transcriptase in ovarian cancer cells.PloS one · 2014Article
- High Expression of SQSTM1/p62 Protein Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Acta histochemica et cytochemica · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, the cancer stem cell hypothesis has become widely accepted. Cancer stem cells are thought to possess the ability to undergo self-renewal and differentiation, similar to normal stem cells. Nucleostemin (NS), initially cloned from rat neural stem cells, binds to various proteins, including p53, in the nucleus and is thought to be a key molecule for stemness. NS is expressed in various types of cancers; therefore, its role in cancer pathogenesis is thought to be important. This study was conducted to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic impact of NS in invasive breast cancers.
methodThe correlation between NS immunoreactivity and clinicopathological parameters was examined in 220 consecutive surgically resected invasive breast cancer tissue samples by using tissue microarrays. The presence of nuclear NS and p53 immunoreactivity in 10% or more of cancer cells was considered as a positive result.
resultsAmong the 220 patients, 154 were hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, 22 HER2-positive/HR-negative, and 44 HR-negative/HER2-negative. One hundred and forty-two tumors (64.5%) showed NS positivity, and this positivity was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) (P = 0.050), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (P = 0.021), and p53 (P = 0.031) positivity. The patients with NS-positive tumors showed significantly shorter disease-free survival than those with NS-negative tumors. Furthermore, the patient group with NS- and p53-positive tumors showed significantly poorer prognosis than other patient groups. Multivariate analysis showed that NS status was an independent prognostic indicator.
conclusionsNS may play a significant role in the determination of breast cancer progression in association with p53 alterations. The NS status of patients with luminal and HER2 type breast cancers may be a useful prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.