Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24650222›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014

Parallel affinity-based isolation of leukocyte subsets using microfluidics: application for stroke diagnosis.

Swathi R Pullagurla, Małgorzata A Witek, Joshua M Jackson, Maria A M Lindell, Mateusz L Hupert, Irina V Nesterova, Alison E Baird, Steven A Soper

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Application of microfluidic chips in anticancer drug screening.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Liquid biopsy markers for stroke diagnosis.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Swathi R PullagurlaDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, United States.
Małgorzata A Witek
Joshua M Jackson
Maria A M Lindell
Mateusz L Hupert
Irina V Nesterova
Alison E Baird
Steven A Soper
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USLouisiana State University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

spFRET for Expression Profiling mRNA: Discovering Markers for Stroke DiagnosisR01EB010087 · NIBIB · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI BAIRD, ALISON E, SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2011 to 2014
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB10087ANIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the design and performance of a polymer microfluidic device that can affinity select multiple types of biological cells simultaneously with sufficient recovery and purity to allow for the expression profiling of mRNA isolated from these cells. The microfluidic device consisted of four independent selection beds with curvilinear channels that were 25 μm wide and 80 μm deep and were modified with antibodies targeting antigens specifically expressed by two different cell types. Bifurcated and Z-configured device geometries were evaluated for cell selection. As an example of the performance of these devices, CD4+ T-cells and neutrophils were selected from whole blood as these cells are known to express genes found in stroke-related expression profiles that can be used for the diagnosis of this disease. CD4+ T-cells and neutrophils were simultaneously isolated with purities >90% using affinity-based capture in cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) devices with a processing time of ∼3 min. In addition, sufficient quantities of the cells could be recovered from a 50 μL whole blood input to allow for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) following cell lysis. The expression of genes from isolated T-cells and neutrophils, such as S100A9, TCRB, and FPR1, was evaluated using RT-PCR. The modification and isolation procedures demonstrated here can also be used to analyze other cell types as well where multiple subsets must be interrogated.

Indexed as

2-PropanolAlkenesAntigens, CDCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Adhesion MoleculesCell SeparationGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansIndicators and ReagentsIn Vitro TechniquesLymphocyte SubsetsMicrofluidicsNeutrophilsPolymersPolymethyl MethacrylateRNA, Messenger2-PropanolAlkenesAntigens, CDCEACAM8 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesGPI-Linked ProteinsIndicators and ReagentsPolymersPolymethyl MethacrylateRNA, MessengerSodium Hydroxide

Identifiers

PMID24650222
PMCPMC4004188
OpenAlexW1996804466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.