Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24650164›Full record

Trial reportPerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2014

Prime Time: long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention.

Renee E Sieving, Annie-Laurie McRee, Molly Secor-Turner, Ann W Garwick, Linda H Bearinger, Kara J Beckman, Barbara J McMorris, Michael D Resnick

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Theory-based interventions for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Adolescent Preferences for a Pediatric Primary Care-based Sexually Transmitted Infection and HIV Prevention Intervention.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Renee E SievingSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Annie-Laurie McRee
Molly Secor-Turner
Ann W Garwick
Linda H Bearinger
Kara J Beckman
Barbara J McMorris
Michael D Resnick
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USNorth Dakota State University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

HEALTHY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PREVENTION RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTER-CATEGORY 1U48DP001939 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RESNICK, MICHAEL DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$4.9M
Prime Time: Health Promotion for Multiple Risk BehaviorsR01NR008778 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SIEVING, RENEE E · 2006 to 2010
$2.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001939NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP001939NINR NIH HHS 5R01-NR008778NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008778PHS HHS T32HP22239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEvidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services.

methodsIn a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up.

resultsAt 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6% of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72% vs. 37%; odds ratio, 4.5).

conclusionHealth services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.

Indexed as

Case ManagementLeadershipAdolescentCondomsContraception BehaviorEducational StatusFamilyFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSchoolsSocial SupportTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24650164
PMCPMC4347930
OpenAlexW2144778890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.