Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24650023›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2014

Where is the neck? Alpha angle measurement revisited.

Heinse Bouma, Niels-Jan Slot, Paul Toogood, Tom Pollard, Paulien van Kampen, Tom Hogervorst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring 3D growth plate shape: Methodology and application to cam morphology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Femoroacetabular impingement: question-driven review of hip joint pathophysiology from asymptomatic skeletal deformity to end-stage osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Using a numerical method to precisely evaluate the alpha angle in a hip image.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Heinse BoumaDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery , Haga Hospital, the Hague , the Netherlands .
Niels-Jan Slot
Paul Toogood
Tom Pollard
Paulien van Kampen
Tom Hogervorst
Haga Hospital · NLRoyal Berkshire Hospital · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe alpha angle is the most used measurement to classify concavity of the femoral head-neck junction. It is not only used for treatment decisions for hip impingement, but also in cohort studies relating hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Alpha angle measurement requires identification of the femoral neck axis, the definition of which may vary between studies. The original "3-point method" uses 1 single point to construct the femoral neck axis, whereas the "anatomic method" uses multiple points and attempts to define the true anatomic neck axis. Depending on the method used, the alpha angle may or may not account for other morphological characteristics such as head-neck offset.

methodsWe compared 2 methods of alpha angle measurement (termed "anatomic" and "3-point") in 59 cadaver femora and 83 cross-table lateral radiographs of asymptomatic subjects. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots.

resultsDiscrepancies of up to 13 degrees were seen between the methods. The 3-point method had an "equalizing effect" by disregarding femoral head position relative to the neck: in femora with high alpha angle, it resulted in lower values than anatomic measurement, and vice versa in femora with low alpha angles. Using the anatomic method, we derived a reference interval for the alpha angle in normal hips in the general population of 30-66 degrees.

interpretationWe recommend the anatomic method because it also reflects the position of the femoral head on the neck. Consensus and standardization of technique of alpha angle measurement is warranted, not only for planar measurements but also for CT or MRI-based measurements.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesFemaleFemurFemur HeadFemur NeckHumansMaleRadiography

Identifiers

PMID24650023
PMCPMC3967256
OpenAlexW2053313856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.