Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24649332›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2014

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: Treatment outcomes of five cases.

Tsubasa Watanabe, Takashi Mizowaki, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yusuke Iizuka, Kengo Ogura, Katsuyuki Sakanaka, Susumu Miyamoto, Masahiro Hiraoka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Revisiting the metastatic potential of childhood pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsubasa WatanabeDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takashi MizowakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Yoshiki ArakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Yusuke IizukaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kengo OguraDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Katsuyuki SakanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Masahiro HiraokaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is a rare disease, first classified by the World Health Organization in 2000. The number of available studies on the treatment of PPTID is currrently limited and the optimal management for this disease has not yet been determined. We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes for PPTID at our institute and analyzed the roles of radiation therapy and chemotherapy for this disease. The clinical data on five patients diagnosed with PPTID since 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with cerebrospinal dissemination at diagnosis received biopsy-only surgery, craniospinal and whole-ventricular irradiation and chemotherapy. Patients with locally limited disease at diagnosis received local or whole-ventricular irradiation after surgery. The median relapse-free and overall survival were 72.9 and 94.1 months, respectively. Two of the five patients developed a relapse of cerebrospinal dissemination after treatment and succumbed to the disease. All the patients who received both craniospinal and whole-ventricular irradiation exhibited evidence of cerebral white matter abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging and developed neurocognitive disorders after treatment. Although PPTID may be aggressive and has cerebrospinal fluid seeding potential, PPTID patients may survive long-term, even after recurrence. Considering the long survival time and the late adverse effects due to intensive treatment, the irradiation field and usage of chemotherapy after surgery require optimization.

Indexed as

chemotherapypineal parenchymal tumorpineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiationradiation therapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID24649332
PMCPMC3917789
OpenAlexW2165595626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.